• 5

    Add Settings for a Flow triggered by a PowerApp to run the Flow by the user of the PowerApp instead of the owner of the PowerApp

    Suggested by Jonathan Weidner New  1 Comments

    When using a PowerApp to modify records in D365, the records "Createdby" and "Modifiedby" display the owner of the PowerApp instead of the user of the PowerApp making the changes. It would be helpful to have a feature added in PowerAutomate where the Flow PowerApp trigger could be set to run as the user of the PowerApp instead of the Owner. There appears to be no settings to do this on Flows triggered by a PowerApp as compared to Flows triggered by Microsoft Dataverse.

  • 5

    Regression: 2021 release wave 2: It is no longer possible to open a record in a new tab/window

    Suggested by Iryna Taran New  1 Comments

    After applying of 2021 release wave 2 it is no longer possible to open a record in a new tab/window. Please return that feature back. It was very convenient to open records in a new tab/window from a view.

  • 5

    Importing unmanaged Power Apps solution should provide more explicit guidance on missing dependencies

    Suggested by Rich Hims New  1 Comments

    When moving an unmanaged solution from one environment to another (perhaps via source control), an administrator may encounter errors on import referring to missing dependencies (example below). The error message refers to versioned packages which are present in D365 Apps, but there appears to be no explicit way of identifying which package is contained in which app (the documentation on this point - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/data-platform/import-update-export-solutions - states that there will be a link available to install the app, but that's not my experience). It would be helpful if the error message either (a) explicitly stated which app should be installed to resolve each dependency or (b) included a link to a list that allowed the user to identify the app that contains each package. ---- There are missing dependencies. Install the following solutions before installing this one: "Dynamics365Company (2.2.2.5)", "Dynamics365FinanceAndOperationsCommon (2.2.2.50)", "Dynamics365FinanceExtended (2.2.2.98)", "FieldServiceCommon (1.0.0.134)", "Dynamics365SupplyChainExtended (2.2.2.98)", "HCMCommon (2.2.0.3)" ----

  • 5

    Accessing Saved Views from Advanced Find should also then add those views in the list of Recent Items list in the left pane

    Suggested by Yogesh Doshi New  0 Comments

    If on Contact I created a personal view, and save it. Then i can query the view from Home page of Contact, or I can open Advanced Find and query the saved view. Regardless of which approach we use, the saved view must show in the Recent Items list. Noticed that this doesnt happen if view is accessed from Advanced Find.

  • 5

    Audit All Entities Option

    Suggested by Paul Bednall New  1 Comments

    Enable a new option under the Global Audit Settings within a Power Platform environment to enable auditing for ALL entities. Whilst this may not be recommended, some organisations are mandated to audit EVERYTHING. There are already options to enable auditing for "Common Entities", "Marketing Entities", etc. Can we have an option for "All Entities (not recommended)"? This will avoid having to either manually amend the audit settings for every entity or develop a solution to do it. It would also mean that auditing would be automatically enabled for new entities that Microsoft introduce instead of having to constantly monitor for these new entities, update solutions and redeploy to many environments

  • 5

    Delete Users from Power Platform Admin Portal

    Suggested by Haresh Melwani New  0 Comments

    We should have the ability to delete users from the Power Platform Admin Portal. There are many scenarios that require us to delete users. A few examples are separated users, name change, spelling mistake, etc.. Without this option, the list of users will grow over time and become cumbersome to manage. Please implement this ASAP!

  • 4

    Feature Request – Dashboard for Audit Log Retention Tracking in Power Platform

    Suggested by Rajalaxmi Rout New  0 Comments

    Currently, there is no centralized dashboard available to track audit log settings and retention periods across environments in Power Platform. This creates a visibility gap for administrators who need to monitor and manage data governance effectively.

    We’ve observed the following:

    • Audit logs can have their retention period set to "forever", which may lead to excessive Dataverse storage usage if not regularly monitored.
    • At present, admins must manually access each environment’s settings to review audit log status and retention configuration.
    • There is no consolidated view to track Dataverse audit log usage, retention periods, or potential overuse risks.


    We propose a feature enhancement to include a dashboard in the Power Platform Admin Center that provides:

    • A summary view of audit log status and retention periods for each environment.
    • Alerts or indicators for environments with indefinite retention settings.
    • Usage statistics showing how much Dataverse space is consumed by audit logs.
    • Add two new actions(get audit settings and update audit settings) in the PowerPlatformforAdmins connector.

    This would enable admins to take proactive measures for capacity planning and ensure compliance with internal data retention policies.

    Thank you for considering this request.


  • 4

    Allow out-of-box methods to export attachments with along with the records they're attached to

    Suggested by Kevin Quach New  0 Comments

    Issue:

    Attachments need to be exported separately from their parent records, which requires re-setup of relationships, consumes time, and more often than not, it can mess up data


    Suggestion:

    Please implement some out-of-box methods to allow attachments to be exported along with the "main" table as one entity. One current suggestion is to make it so that attachments are "bonded" with the records that contain them, as a field instead in addition to being saved in a table and using a pointer.


    Benefits:

    • Reduce time commitment
    • Ensures data integrity
    • Frees the relationship to the attachments table
    • Eliminates a lot of the requirement to use third party tools

  • 4

    Maintenance window settings - more options

    Suggested by Andy Rehak New  0 Comments

    Ideas:

    1. Allow administrators to exclude one day per week to accommodate weekly after hours deploys.
    2. Shrink the 9 hour requirement or make it variable so customers have more flexibility to install solutions after hours


    Currently, the maintenance window settings for production environments require you to have 9 hours available every day of the week for Microsoft-owned solutions to install. Microsoft recommends administrators deploy to prod after hours. However, with the limited maintenance window settings we have access to, if we deploy at 10pm and open for business at 7am, Microsoft's maintenance window gets in the way and blocks us from importing solutions.


    Thanks!


  • 4

    Remove deprecated "auditretentionperiod" attribute when using API call

    Suggested by Kevin Duong New  0 Comments

    When using the API call to "/api/data/v9.0/organizations", the value for "auditretentionperiod" does not reflect the audit retention period setting in admin center. However, the value is updated correctly for "auditretentionperiodv2", which can cause confusion to customers. The "auditretentionperiod" attribute should be removed to avoid confusion.