12

Displaying the variant name in the production orders instead of the description name of the product master.

The All production orders form page as well as the pop-up menu doesn't display released product variant name, but instead the normal description of the product master is used.


The users need to see the variant name displayed in the product name field and needs to make sure th...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
New
12

PFE error messages display

It is possible to setup error messages to be displayed in Production floor execution, in order to control the quantities started/completed in the production orders operations (setup is in Production control>Setup>Manufacturing execution>Production order de...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
New
12

Change UoM when reporting the last operation as completed in the PFE so packing operations are supported

Scenario: last production job is a packing operation where multiple items are packed into pallets.


Current solution: worker needs to report progress multiple times specifying the correct pallet quantity. A LP label is printed each time.


Desired solution: pall...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Under Review
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. This is a great suggestion!

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann

PM, Microsoft

12

Remove restrictions for COPY BOM and COPY ROUTE for Production orders

The COPY option for Prod BOM and Prod Route is important functionality. It is however close to unusuable because of the unreasonable restrictions on order status. It is very real life to have the need for COPY BOM or COPY ROUTE when the prod order is in estimated status or scheduled status. The ...

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

 

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann

PM, Microsoft

12

Production floor execution is missing focus point on start page.

When opening the production floor execution interface there is no focus point in the start page. Meaning that if you want to clock in using a badge ID that you scan via a card, reader nothing will be read as the field isn't activated before you manually click in it.

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Completed
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. We released this feature as part of a bug fix in release: 10.0.25

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann

PM, Microsoft

12

Route Card Posting from RAF Journal

The RAF journal posting process can be set up to "backflush" the BOM lines based on the quantity reported, but you cannot post a route card journal using this process. This means that if you intend to auto post time, you must do it at "Start" which will consume all of the route time leaving no...

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Under Review
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

This is a great suggestion! We will consider this in our roadmap.

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann, Program Manager

Microsoft.

11

Inventory status in Production floor execution (Manufacturing execution)

When reporting as finished in Production floor execution interface, it should be possible to change Inventory status.

For manufacturing companies it's very critical to indicate "quarantine" inventory status if something goes wrong in production. It is possible to do tha...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
New
11

Possibility to use quality association for Kanban items in order to generate Quality order

Hello,

It will be very interesting to have the possibility to user Quality association for Kanban items in order to generate Quality order

Thanks

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann

PM, Microsoft

11

Half day for special day

For time and attendance special day, we need half day because we have employees with 4 and half day work calendar. When we have a special day we give a full day but spent on two days. As example: normal calendar is from monday to thurday 8h-17h and friday from 8h -12h. When we have a special d...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Under Review
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

This is a great suggestion! We will consider this in our roadmap.

Sincerely,

Johan Hoffmann, Program Manager

Microsoft.

11

Use the job card device without the whole time and attendance functionality

Some businesses want to use the job card device basically as a tool to execute and track real-time production and provide instructions and guidance to the floor. They may not have the need to control time and attendance of production workers at all. Sometimes they'd like to but they are not st...

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Production Control (422)

STATUS DETAILS
Declined
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

We do not have in our current plans to enable separation of the use of the Job Card Device from the time and attendance functionality. However, for customers who do not use the time and attendance functionality it is now possible to set up the Approve and Transfer process as a recurrent batch job. This is done from the update menu in the Approve form. In this case you need to setup a recurrent batch job for "Approve all" and "Transfer all". It is not enough only to set it up for "Transfer all", because the registrations need to be approved first when using this functionality. In this type of scenario it is recommended to use a time profile without Clock-in and Clock-out. This way you ensure that the calculation in the approve form is not failing due to missing absence codes. 

 

Sincerely,

 Johan Hoffmann

PM,

Microsoft.