Landed cost module - Goods in transit triggered without invoice
Create "Goods in transit orders" without invoice posting. In landed cost module, system needs to post the invoice to create "Goods in transit orders", this step reflects the point in the journey where risk transfers from seller to buyer in international and domestic contracts for the delivery o...
Add charges to transfer order lines based on freight rates
The following scenario has been raised and should be considered subject to change: • Create a purchase order for item Y into warehouse X. • Receive the purchase order. • Crete a transfer order for item Y from warehouse X to warehouse Z. Both warehouses are warehouse-management-processes enabled....
Once this capability is released, and if you still require to be able to manually create and update miscellaneous charges related to transfer orders in general with the ability to include the charge in an item inventory valuation, then please create an idea for the transfer order in inventory management. That will allow Microsoft to plan accordingly.
Enable Landed Cost functionality for PO's linked to a project
Enable the Landed Cost functionality so that purchase orders linked to a project have budget control that includes the costs of goods in transit.
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Roger Sa
PM, Microsoft
Landed cost - Post invoice with catch weight items
Currently the landed cost module does not support catch weight. Specifically, when you post the invoice of the related purchase order (to move the goods into the Goods in Transit warehouse) the following error is displayed “Full catch weight quantity was not processed. To resolve this issue go...
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Load Building Workbench to Support Catch Weight Items
For easier load planning, it would be very helpful to allow catch weight items to be supported on Load Building Workbench.
Load planning workbench needs 1 enhancement
It is not possible to combine different order types in planning a load, for example combining sales orders and transfer orders. But a distribution company with their own trucks and many facilities from which they deliver to customers, are doing this routinely to make sure trucks are as full as po...
Thank you for your feedback. The feature is supported in load planning workbench.
Sincerely,
Roger Sa
PM, Microsoft
Move Sales Orders (License Plates) to New/Existing Shipment
I love the organizational structure of Load>Shipment(s)>Sales Order(s). It's logical and easy to grasp. The issue I find is, Sales Orders are not given enough emphasis after stepping down from Shipments. Once multiple orders are consolidated, there is no easy way to break them apart again. Sa...
Get the TMS working well without WMS
Currently it is possible to use TMS without WMS by enabling the warehouse for WHS but and the items should be enabled for TMS but not for WHS. Thus they appear in the Load Planning Workbench and they can be added in loads. Unfortunately, the loads are not linked with the picking lists, and some ...
Multiple freight bills per invoice
It should be possible to process one invoice for transportation services that includes more than 1 freight bill. Transport vendors send invoices that include more than 1 contracted service, this can be daily or monthly. They don’t send one invoice per freight bill.
Now in D365fO ...
Generate carrier Purchase orders based on Freight bills
Many D365 customers use either standard purchase order / invoice match logic or invoice match in ISV products like exflow. It's therefore not optimal to have second invoice reconciliation process for Freight invoices in TMS. Instead of using TMS freigt invoice reconciliation, TMS could generate a...
Administrator
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Roger Sa
PM, Microsoft