Using vendor calendar to plan correct delivey dates
A lot of vendors deliver only on fixed days. Currently it is not possible to use the vendor calendar to manage this (or ay other setting in Ax). I propose to use the open calendar days linked to a vendor to manage this : calculate next delivery date based on Leadtime/receipt margin etc, and than ...
Intercompany planned demand vs transport days and sales lead time
When using intercompany master planning, transport days are not applied. The system considers the downstream planned purchase order requirement date, as the requested date for the planned production order (e.g). When you have just few days between shipment and receipt and short production lead...
coverage functionality "make-to-order"
There should be a coverage group functionality “make-to-order”. Master planning and Explosion should always show either a planned production order or a planned purchase order even if there is stock physical available.
Maybe this could be solved by positive days with negativ...
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Christian Rytt
PM,
Microsoft.
MRP should solve the Delay with resource group
We can set Quantity on Resource load in Route for using resources effectively.
However, the setting is not sufficient for the scenario which has "peak" orders.
For example,
- 10 quantities are created per 1 day by 1 resource.
- 1st April: 1 order with ...
Thank you for your feedback. We need some more details to understand your suggestion better. Can you please help us by answering the following questions?
One potential way of allocating more resources for the production on day 4 is to have multiple active and approved route versions, which have a different From quantity. E.g. You would have a route version with resource quantity 2, for any order for less then 100 pieces and a route version with resource quantity 4, for any order for more than 100 pieces. Would this be an acceptable solution?
Sincerely,
Roxana Christina Diaconu
PM, Microsoft
Prevent an user to submit Firm and consolidate process for same planned batch orders already in process
We should prevent an user to submit Firm and consolidate process for same plan batch orders that have been already submitted for processing by another user. Scenario is as follows: - User A is selecting several planned batch orders for an item and is submitting the Firm and consolidate process. -...
Demand Forecasting with Multiple Planners
Currently the demand forecasting tool is not designed for multiple Planners across multiple Legal Entities and working independently of each other. The Generate Statistical Baseline Forecast will run across all Legal Entities and remove existing baseline forecasts. In larger, international compa...
We would like to check order status in Net requirements form
For easy checking, the status in orders should be displayed in Net requirements form. E.g., for purchase order : PurchTable.DocumentStatus for sales order : SalesTable.DocumentStatus
Firm planned orders in batch based on query
In master planning, it is possible to setup automatic firming time fence on coverage groups. What I experience as an requested feature is the possibility to perform firming of planned order in recurring batch job, based on a predefined query. I therefore suggest that I can create a feature, that...
Master planning must match Customer Batch Attribute requirements for On-Hand inventory
When a customer has specific Batch Attribute requirements, pegging in Master planning must match these Requirements against available Onhand with batch dimension.
Sequencing to cover discrete manufacturing
At the moment Sequences can relate only to process manufacturing items (Production type Formula) to generate sequence for batch orders. Because of setup times optimization etc. there are also requirements to sequence production orders.
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Christian Rytt
PM,
Microsoft.
Administrator
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Christian Rytt
PM,
Microsoft.