15

MRP should solve the Delay with resource group

We can set Quantity on Resource load in Route for using resources effectively.

 

However, the setting is not sufficient for the scenario which has "peak" orders.

For example,

- 10 quantities are created per 1 day by 1 resource.

- 1st April: 1 order with ...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
Under Review
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. We need some more details to understand your suggestion better. Can you please help us by answering the following questions?

 One potential way of allocating more resources for the production on day 4 is to have multiple active and approved route versions, which have a different From quantity. E.g. You would have a route version with resource quantity 2, for any order for less then 100 pieces and a route version with resource quantity 4, for any order for more than 100 pieces. Would this be an acceptable solution?

Sincerely,

Roxana Christina Diaconu

PM, Microsoft

14

Demand Forecasting with Multiple Planners

Currently the demand forecasting tool is not designed for multiple Planners across multiple Legal Entities and working independently of each other. The Generate Statistical Baseline Forecast will run across all Legal Entities and remove existing baseline forecasts. In larger, international compa...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
New
14

We would like to check order status in Net requirements form

For easy checking, the status in orders should be displayed in Net requirements form. E.g., for purchase order : PurchTable.DocumentStatus for sales order : SalesTable.DocumentStatus

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
New
13

Prevent an user to submit Firm and consolidate process for same planned batch orders already in process

We should prevent an user to submit Firm and consolidate process for same plan batch orders that have been already submitted for processing by another user. Scenario is as follows: - User A is selecting several planned batch orders for an item and is submitting the Firm and consolidate process. -...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
New
13

Firm planned orders in batch based on query

In master planning, it is possible to setup automatic firming time fence on coverage groups. What I experience as an requested feature is the possibility to perform firming of planned order in recurring batch job, based on a predefined query. I therefore suggest that I can create a feature, that...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
New
13

Master planning must match Customer Batch Attribute requirements for On-Hand inventory

When a customer has specific Batch Attribute requirements, pegging in Master planning must match these Requirements against available Onhand with batch dimension.

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
New
13

coverage calculation by inventory status > net requirement with empty inventory status

If the setup requires coverage calculation by dimension inventory status, there appear data sets on net requirement with empty inventory status. This is very difficult to understand by the customer and also difficult to explain. There should be a solution to prevent empty inventory status in c...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Christian Rytt

PM,

Microsoft.

13

PO per site and supplier

When firming planned orders form different sites with same supplier one (1) PO is created with lines updated with delivery addresses to those sites. The PO-header has a delivery address from one of the sites. Here D365O has to create one (1) PO per site and supplier or give the user a choice t...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Christian Rytt

PM,

Microsoft.

12

Firm by Site and Warehouse

I suggest parameters to support firming of orders by Site and Warehouse.

Such parameters would give the&nb...

Read more...

2 Comments

Read more... 2 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Christian Rytt

PM,

Microsoft.

11

Sequencing to cover discrete manufacturing

At the moment Sequences can relate only to process manufacturing items (Production type Formula) to generate sequence for batch orders. Because of setup times optimization etc. there are also requirements to sequence production orders.

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (125)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Christian Rytt

PM,

Microsoft.