Workflow for Firmed Planned Purchase Order
After planned purchase orders are firmed, the ‘Approval status’ is default to ‘Approved’ on purchase order screen, which is skipping the purchase order workflow. Suggest to default the ‘Approval status’ to ‘Draft’ while workflow is enabled; or ha...
Consider "Receipt margin" in ATP dates
ATP shows purchase order receipts as available the day of receipt, but for some companies the receipts are usually not ready the day of arrival. It would be great to have ATP take into account the Receipt margin. Currently master planning takes into account receipt margin, but ATP da...
Thanks for your input! If it gets voted, we will consider adding it to our long term roadmap.
Sincerely,
Beatriz Nebot Gracia
Product Manager, Microsoft
Production pool on planned orders form
Please consider adding the production pool to the planned orders form. One of our customers is requesting this feature.
The production pool is equal to the buyer group – it is the same idea – buyer group for purchase items - production pool for manufacturing items.
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Christian Rytt
PM,
Microsoft.
Ability to filter on additional input criteria for Planning Optimization
Currently the only filters on input for Planning Optimization are related to which items should be included in the planning run or whether the forecast should be included (plan filters, runtime filters, coverage groups, etc.) but some businesses have scenarios in addition where they want to ex...
Thanks for your input! If it gets voted, we will consider adding it to our long term roadmap.
Sincerely,
Beatriz Nebot Gracia
Product Manager, Microsoft
The ATP delivery date calculation for a sales order line does not take the dimension "inventory status" into account.
Description of problem: The ATP delivery date calculation for a sales order line does not take the dimension "inventory status" into account. Therefore: - The ATP overview is incorrect - Calculated delivery dates following ATP or ATP + Issue margin strategies are wrong - Delivery date control ov...
Thanks for your input! We're considering if to add it to our long term roadmap.
Sincerely,
Beatriz Nebot Gracia
Product Manager, Microsoft
Material availablity from Planned Orders forms
A user should be able to see if materials are available prior to firming planned production and/or planned transfer orders. Currently one can only see delays and it's not clear if material is available. The current functionality of seeing if material is available when releasing production order...
CTP on sales quotations
Delivery date control = CTP is apparently not supported on Sales quotations. What are Manufacturing companies supposed to do then? It should be supported.
We appreciate you taking the time to submit the product suggestion. We will monitor the votes and other feedback and prioritize it accordingly in our backlog.
Dasani Madipalli - Program Manager - Microsoft Dynamics for SCM
Shift planning/dispatching for MES Workers (Generic resources) - and eventually Warehouse and qualtity workers
In the current Operations resource model, it is not possible to plan for shifts, as a job cannot be split by shifts (Often the worker is the secondary resource on a machine resource, what makes it even more complex). The consequence is that you have to set up "Generic" worker resources, that have...
Planning Optimization does not consider Vendor Purchase Calendar closed days when calculating Delivery Date due to Lead time days
Summary:
If a Vendor typically shuts down completely for a month (ie Chinese holiday season) or typical 2-3 week MFG holiday shutdown or yearly long-term plant maintenance. Would like to use the Vendor's Purchase Calendar in D365FO with Working Days = Yes to account fo...
Thanks for your input! If it gets voted, we will consider adding it to our long term roadmap.
Sincerely,
Beatriz Nebot Gracia
Senior Product Mananager, Microsoft
ATP ignores marking and presents wrong calculated delivery times
A Purchase order P1 with ATP is created and a Sales order S1 is processed from second purchase order P2. The marking between these 2 (S1 and P2) orders is confirmed but the ATP is based on the P1 instead of P2. Once a new sales order S2 is created and the ATP is checked and quantity becomes ph...
Appreciate you taking the time to submit the product suggestion. We will monitor the votes and other feedback to consider in future backlog.
Lachlan Cash – Principal Program Manager - Microsoft
Administrator
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Roxana Diaconu
PM, Microsoft