Marian Wrice Microsoft Pty Ltd Sr Tech Support Eng SEE

In D365 TH localizations, the Withholding Tax Certificate or any TH localization tax certificates do not include/print the Actual Vendor Name from the payments tab.

This is logged through LCS

Details for issue 661151 (dynamics.com)

Issue 661151 - By design

TH- The Withholding tax certificate is not printing the Actual vendor name from the payments tab

Product and version: Finance and Operations

PROBLEM

The Withholding tax certificate and WHT reports are not printing the Actual vendor name from the payments tab

REMARKS

Microsoft has evaluated the issue and determined that WHT reports are working as they were designed. These reports do not consider TH local field Actual vendor name in vendor payment journal. We understand your concern and how this can affect your business however we'll not be purcuing a fix for this issue now in scope of a bug. For supporting a scenario when employee is reporting expenses from the purchases of services eligible for WHT, please log an IDEA.

The customer would like to see this information included as this is a requirement for their business

In Expense Management, the customer wants to post their Expense Entries to the General Ledger in Detail but in Summary in the subledger.

They have set the option: Allow grouping of transactions based on offset account specified on the payment method = No because they want a detailed entry in the General ledger.

Expense management parameters | Microsoft Docs

What the system is currently doing is that this:

1. Creates a detailed entry in the General ledger which is what they want BUT
2. Then creates multiple voucher entries based on the number of Expense payment methods available in the Expense report on the AP/Vendor side.

What they would like to see happen is that the entries are posted in Detail to the General ledger as required and post to the subledger (AP/Vendor) in summary.

This behavior already exists in the Purchase order and Sales Order side. The PO invoice is detailed and the AP side is summarized. They want the similar behavior to be rolled out to the Expense report as well.

In the current D365 code, the matching rule only supports one statement line matching with one bank transaction.

This information has been published through the LCS link below:

Details for issue 664112 (dynamics.com)

The customer would like to have the ability to setup the matching rules for auto-matching with One statement line against multiple Bank Transactions.

In 10.0.27 and above, a change was introduced through the issue number below that now prevents users from entering bundle items into the Sales Agreement line.

This is regardless of the settings in Max Enforced = Yes/No.

Details for issue 655051 (dynamics.com)

Our customer would like to have the ability to enter Bundle items in the Sales agreement if this option is set to No.

In the current code, there is no out of box data entities available for the Fixed Asset budget journal and the fixed asset budget register entries.

Our customer would like to request for these to be added as these are needed as well by the customers.

Feature "Allow edits to internal data on general ledger vouchers" feature allows editing of vouchers that are in periods that are on hold or closed.

Our customer would like to request for a feature added to give users the option to prevent the edit on closed/on hold periods.

More information on the current design of this feature can be found through LCS article 835551 wit h this information:

Feature "Allow edits to internal data on general ledger vouchers" feature allows editing of vouchers that are in periods that are on hold or closed. 

External Solution

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We understand how frustrating it can be when something doesn’t work the way you expect it to. Upon further investigation, we have determined that the issue you reported is not a bug but rather a feature that was designed to work in a specific way.

The feature is by design because of the following: Change to posted vouchers in general ledger are limited to data that is internal in nature. The changes do not impact data for external financial statement reporting. As such, there is no restriction imposed, based on the period status.

We will continue to track this issue and monitor if other customers are impacted. We appreciate your feedback and want you to know that we are always working to improve our products and services.

D365 Finance and Operations offers Electronic Reporting Payment method files and users are able to generate this by going to Accounts Payable | Payment Journal and Generate Payment.

The users would like to have an out of box feature that allows for the generate payment process to be automated

From 10.0.38 a new feature was added called Enable Recurring AP Invoices

Customer would like to suggest having data entities available that will help them with faster data entries using Data entities.

The Data entities they would like to have is for the Vendor invoice templates and accounting distributions on the Vendor Master record.

In the current standard code, the pending vendor invoice form only allows non stock items to be created without a purchase order.

The customer has a business need to be able to create the invoice through the pending vendor invoice form for their stocked items without a purchase order.