Dynamics 365 Finance

Vietnam companies want to have similar function like RUS localization, my current customer want to have that function and It may require a lot of effort to customize. Could we enable that function for specific customers in Vietnam please ?

Our customers would like request Microsoft developer the Registers K250 e K255 to Fiscal Books feature to generate file to Sped fiscal.

Item valued at weighted avg. method When using a charge code setup as : item vs. ledger account (posting "order fee" for instance) the posting is ok at reception and invoice steps: Cost of purchased materials received vs. order fee which includes order fee in stock value. But when you want to add this charge code to an already invoiced transaction the posting results in: Cost of purchased materials invoiced vs. Purchase, stock variation => OK and Order fee vs. Purchase, charge => KO There is no reason why charge should be modified by an external charge code (external = this charge is not invoiced by the PO vendor but by another vendor). Why we ask if this feature could be corrected to the extent that it entails wrong posting? If charge code is setup item vs ledger account then in the case it's added on an invoice only Cost of purchased materials invoiced vs. Purchase, stock variation is to be posted.

We have to upload duties in one role but we do not have any uploading tool or excel file. Kindly consider to provide the same in D365. Thanks,

Wish there is an option to future include intracompany banking transfers for purpose to easily visualize transfer source and to with option to visualize source and/or destination of banking accounts., in addition to standard ledger intracompany journal transfers or decentralized payments.

In versions prior to 10.0.18 a Bundle item could be used on a sales order and the bundle price was correctly apportioned across all BoM lines on SO confirmation. The SO Invoice also showed corretctly. From version 10.0.18 this functionality has been removed and the Bundle now needs at least one chile line to have a base sell price on the item card for the Bundle price to be allocated without error. We would like to see the functionality reinstated so that products contained within a bundle can use either a base sell price OR a trade agreement price.

On October 23, 2018, Law Decree 119 (L.D.119/2018) in Italy introduced a change in Italian value-added tax (VAT) management. This change went into effect on July 1, 2019. Here is a summary of the change: 1) For the supply of goods and services, the invoice can be issued by the fifteenth day of the month after the month when the VAT point was triggered. Invoices that are issued and booked before the fifteenth day of the month after the month when the VAT point was triggered must be included in the VAT settlement of the previous month. 2) Invoices that are booked before the fifteenth day of the next month but have a reference to the previous VAT settlement should not interrupt the sequential posting. If invoices have a VAT point date in the previous month but an invoice date in the current month, they should be booked in chronological order with the invoices in the current month that have a reference that indicates that these invoices are related to the previous VAT settlement. Thus, the system should allow the posting of the VAT register date in the previous month respect to the posting date, only if the document date is referred to the previous month and the posting date is booked before the fifteenth day of the month. While the invoices posted after the fifteenth day of the month the system must check that the date of VAT register is included in the same month. At the moment such control is not available and this can cause mistakes in VAT declaration. Such control should be activated at taxbooksection level in order to decide which tax book section should maintain this check or not. Not all tax book sections require this control. Many thanks Regards Gian Luca

Many customer demand easier and more automatized process for settling customer payments. International Structured Creditor Reference would be a beneficial by this requirement to be implemented to D365. European payments council has a white paper from this: https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/sites/default/files/KB/files/EPC142-08-EPC-Guidance-on-Creditor-Reference-ISO-Std.pdf Reference is based on ISO 11649 standard. There's already feature called Configurable payment ID. If Modulo 97 is added there, it would create the needed check digits for the RF-reference. Here's also a guidance from Finnish Finance: https://www.finanssiala.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Introduction_of_the_global_Structured_Creditor_Reference.pdf

Currently Report sales tax for settlement period can be created only for settlement period. For audit purposes and reconciliation the report need to be generated for period selected from user. This will allow user to check settlement for quarterly or annual depend from the need. New report based on current one will be best solution Report sales tax settlement for period.

Currently tax information is kept in Line level like PO,SO etc . User has to key in each and every line like Tax location,Exempt,Service category ,Non-gst fields etc. this is causing errors and lot of time . If option is given to update these in Header and use some function to copy to line level it will be really useful for many companies