-
Entity Wise Security on the Standard Analytical Reports
Suggested by Shabbir Ahmad – Planned – 0 Comments
I am facing issue with the Analytical Reports - as some users are able to see other legal entities data in the Standard Analytical Reports, the user should have access to the entities it is assigned in the security configuration.
Its better to extend the security to the Analytical Reports also.
-
Cost invoice (from Invoice Capture) image preview on Vendor Account
Suggested by Suzan Salai – Planned – 0 Comments
When a cost invoice is captured in Invoice Capture, it arrives in the Account Payable module, specifically in the Invoice Journal. The invoice image is accessible on the Journal but not on the Voucher, nor is it linked to the Vendor account.
On the Vendor account, within the Action pane under the Transactions section, clicking on "Invoices" only provides access to the voucher; there is no direct link to the invoice image. However, for Purchase order invoices, the invoice image is available.
Proposed Improvement:
Considering the Danish regulation that mandates all invoice images to be accessible and linked to the voucher, and recognizing the crucial need to easily retrieve invoice images for audit purposes or historical reference, it is recommended to enhance the system. Specifically, making the invoice image from the invoice capture visible on the Vendor account's Invoices page would greatly improve usability.
Your support through voting for this proposed idea would be highly appreciated.
-
Support multiple VAT registration IDs in the same order
Suggested by Allie Tang – Planned – 4 Comments
The scenario where sales tax codes are assigned to different registration numbers under the same sales order or purchase order isn't supported currently by MS. During sales tax calculation and document posting, you receive an error message Different tax registration numbers (VAT IDs) of the legal entity are assigned to the document lines and can't continue the process.
Please kindly help to vote!
-
French e-reporting
Suggested by PICCIN Aymeric – Planned – 1 Comments
Simultaneously with French E-Invoicing regulation, French admistration introduce the e-reporting process.
This e-reporting is precisely described here : https://www.impots.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/media/1_metier/2_professionnel/EV/2_gestion/290_facturation_electronique/specification_externes_b2b/version_2-2_du_31_01_2023/spec_facturation_electronique_v2.2_31-01-2023.zip
in english : https://www.impots.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/media/1_metier/2_professionnel/EV/2_gestion/290_facturation_electronique/specification_externes_b2b/version-english/external-specification-file-in-english-v2.1.zip
D365 Finance should propose something to cover this point.
More widely, this e-reporting take part into the VAT at the digital age (VIDA) project lead by European Commission.
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13186-VAT-in-the-digital-age/F_en
-
Enhancement of line-specific billing schedule termination with refund
Suggested by Melissa Mähnert – Planned – 0 Comments
Current situation
Billing schedule lines can be either terminated completely or line-specific. At the moment, when terminating a specific line with refund, it is neccessary to do double work. The "Terminate" button in the Billing schedule lines section (not action pane header) also just opens the "Mass termination processing" mask. Means, the selection on the specific billing schedule line before does not have any consequence, as you have to remove all lines, which are not supposed to be terminated, afterwards again.
Suggested solution
The "Termination" button in the Billing schedule lines section should only be working when a line (or lines) is (are) selected. After that, it should not be neccessary to remove again all the other billing schedule lines, which should not be terminated. For the solution, you only have to enhance the filter criteria on the "Mass termination processing" mask by adding a filter on the lines.
-
There is no blocker to submit Pending vendor invoice to the Vendor invoice workflow when there is missing mandatory financial dimension
Suggested by Bojana Glisovic – Planned – 1 Comments
Pending vendor invoices can be submitted to the Workflow without any error message, even if there are missing mandatory financial dimensions. This is not the case with the Purchase order. When there is a missing mandatory financial dimension on the purchase order, an error message appears, and submit action is blocked (message attached). What is causing the inconvenience is that if the Pending vendor invoice is submitted to the WF without needed financial dimension values when the workflow is completed vendor invoice can not be posted. To post it, the user must turn it back to the first step in the WF, fill in missing data, and submit it again. These additional steps slow down the business process and lead to wasting time. In the end, latency can cause losing the right to deduct VAT.
-
Configurable business documents - Merge document with application attachments
Suggested by Charissa Stevens – Planned – 1 Comments
For now the MergePDF feature in the ER format can only be used to merge PDF's present as attachment of the running ER format.
It would be nice to extend that list to application attachments in pdf format originating from the source data.
Additionally even using the URL of the attachments to retrieve the pdf document from external location (sharepoint, ...) as well.
Many Thanks!
-
Dynamics 365 F&O GENERAL LEDGER for Voucher Transactions add real user column on overview tab when a journal entry is originated by a batch Job
Suggested by Juan Camilo Durango Lopez – Planned – 0 Comments
Please check Microsoft Support Ticket 2203040040007248.
When we upgraded our ERP from version 20 to version 23, this feature has been actived by default:
Subledger transfer to General Ledger performance optimization
All our journal entries changed the column for "Created by" for "admin", and now we have to click for every voucher on "General" to see the real user who creates the voucher.
This is a huge problem for us, becuase, as a pharma business we are audited very closely, and if we need to export data from "overview tab" we will sending wrong information for our SOX COMPLIANCE and GMP auditors. We are public company listed on Nasdaq.
In the mean time, we just turned off this feature (Subledger transfer to General Ledger performance optimization) in order to recover the real user name.
The workaround provided by Microsoft Support didn´t work for us because we have to travel module by module in order to gather all vouchers transactions generated on all the ERP.
Please take this idea as an formal complaint from our company, if you are going to improve the product, please take care first on not to mess up current functional behavior with "new stuff".
thank you.
-
Reverse Purchase order invoice
Suggested by Brent Wilson – Planned – 12 Comments
We need a quick easy process to reverse Purchase order invoices. The current process of adding a negative quantity line, posting the product receipt and invoice for that line, and then adding a third line to be posted with the correct invoice is much too lengthy and difficult. -
Voucher "Created by" shown as incorrect in Journalizing report and Audit Trail
Suggested by Julian Mifsud – Planned – 2 Comments
When vouchers are posted from the sub-ledger to the ledger via the batch job (Asynchronous or Scheduled batch job), the "Created By" field shows the name of the person configured to run the "Batch transfer for subledger journals" batch job. This is showing incorrect names in the Journalizing reports and audit trails. An audit trail is to know who created the original vouchers, not shown as created all by the same batch job user (typically an admin account).