• 1

    Dynamics 365 Inter-company item trading compliance value impact

    Suggested by Francisco Orozco New  0 Comments

    Wish there is an option to track at time of inter-company the value impact (on consumers or customer or market)


    REMARK: Example forbes, walmar? amazo?




  • 1

    Dynamics 365 Inter-company item trading compliance culture impact

    Suggested by Francisco Orozco New  0 Comments

    Wish there is an option to track at time of inter-company the culture impact (on consumers or customer or market)


    REMARK: Example forbes, walmar? amazo?




  • 1

    Dynamics 365 Product trading compliance Inter-company risks and or allowance

    Suggested by Francisco Orozco New  0 Comments

    Wish there is an option to easily track item trading compliance at point of inter-company, for purpose to identify or visualize risks, compliance and/or permits required at time of inter-company request and/or at time of transaction, for purpose to prevent and or comply with inter-company legal entity risks or allowance or other.



  • 1

    Dynamics 365 Item country trading compliance tracking

    Suggested by Francisco Orozco New  2 Comments

    Wish there is an option to easily maintain and track item country trading compliance, for purpose to comply with trading, tax subject to, permits....


    Not tracking item country trading compliance, user may not easily trade or print or set eligible or subject to at time of transaction or at time of inbounds or outbounds or at time of incoterms compliances.


  • 16

    Reverse work functionality on Loads should work when multiple Work IDs are linked to a load line

    Suggested by Nesrin T New  1 Comments

    On Loads form, Action pane, there is the Reverse work functionality.

    This functionality works fine when there is only one Work Id linked to a Load line.

    If more than one Work IDs were created for a Load line (due to work template/business requirements), Reverse work functionality returns the following error:

    Cannot reverse work because loads have already been picked for the sales line. Use Reduce picked quantity instead of reversing the entire load.

    Use reduce picked quantity line by line in large organizations is not an option as there might be many many lines on a load.


  • 6

    Inventory closing date should reflect the date on which inventory closing is performed instead of date of last transaction posted

    Suggested by Archana Kaushik New  0 Comments

    Current scenario: When inventory close is performed, the system shows date of last transaction posted instead of inventory closing UPTO date provided by user.


    Expected scenario: The system should reflect inventory closing date for all transactions irrespective of their last posted transaction date.


  • 17

    Add a Cancel function to Transfer orders

    Suggested by Alan Batchelor New  0 Comments

    There should be a Cancel function for Transfer orders, similar to Sales orders, where the order does not get deleted, but rather, it's Status changes to "Canceled".

    Currently it is possible, and reasonably common, for a Transfer order to be deleted, and no trace is left of it in the system. Since the stock was being transferred for a reason, this can leave the receiving branch short of stock, and customer satisfaction is badly impacted when their orders are not met.

    It would be far better that a Cancel function existed so that the data was still visible in system, and users could see who canceled it, what was intended to be transferred, and be able to at least create a new order to replace the canceled one, should it still be required.

    Note: I am not talking about the existing cancel function for transfer order shipments; this proposal is for a whole-of-order function, that could be used instead of Delete, with the latter being restricted by security roles to system administrators, say.


  • 4

    Validate negative on-hand before performing inventory closing

    Suggested by Mohamed Shoman New  0 Comments

    While running inventory closing and creating the (Weighted average inventory closing) transactions system is thrown the following error message "Inventory closing cannot proceed because available physical on-hand inventory on item XX is currently negative, which is not allowed according to its item model group." in case of the items have negative on-hand and the item model group doesn't allow physical negative inventory.


    The request is to add an option to validate the negative balance before running the inventory closing.


  • 5

    Integration Work Orders between Dyn365F&O - Asset Management and Dyn365 Field Service

    Suggested by Nicolo Carrero New  0 Comments

    Bidirectional integration for WORK ORDERS (preventive and corrective) between the Asset Management module and Field Service. Including journals made into Work Orders for hours, expenses, and inventory items.

    Some customers use both solutions to support the maintenance process and the Maintenance plan runs in Asset Management but preventive Work Orders are handled in Filed Service. The machine history for all work orders must be visible in Asset Management and all invoices must be made in Project and Accounting.


  • 3

    Support Order-specific BOM calculations for multiple orders and multiple items

    Suggested by Mohamed Shoman New  0 Comments

    As per the current design, it's only possible to calculate the price for a sales order or quotation line by line. The idea is to allow the users to run a job to calculate multiple orders and multiple items in the background like how it currently works with normal costing version calculation.