19

It needs to be possible to include purchase / sales agreements in the master plan calculation

When creating purchase & sales agreements on sku level, it needs to be possible to have these agreements taken into account when calculating the planned orders. Because this is not currently possible, it is difficult to convince our customers to use the agreements and partners create a customized...

Read more...

5 Comments

Read more... 5 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
19

Replenishment based on Reorder point (ROP)

Through the Safety stock-calculation we already have the possibility to calculate the ROP-levels based on the average issue during lead time. However, as the Master scheduling regards the date when the Minimum quantity is reached as a Requirement date (Delivery date) - and not as an Order date...

Read more...

5 Comments

Read more... 5 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Completed
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

During 2021 release wave 2, we shipped "Priority based planning" for Planning Optimization, which allows you to fulfill the orders where the net flow is lower than the reorder point. 

Details on priority based planning can be found in: 

Priority-based planning - Supply Chain Management | Dynamics 365 | Microsoft Docs

Optimize your supply chain with priority-based planning - Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog

Sincerely,

Beatriz Nebot Gracia

PM,

Microsoft.

19

coverage functionality "make-to-order"

There should be a coverage group functionality “make-to-order”. Master planning and Explosion should always show either a planned production order or a planned purchase order even if there is stock physical available.

Maybe this could be solved by positive days with negativ...

Read more...

3 Comments

Read more... 3 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback.

Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Christian Rytt

PM,

Microsoft.

18

Explosion Form- When using the Transfer delay date button, both the confirmed ship date and the confirmed receipt date should be updated accordingly.

Explosion Form- When using the Transfer delay date button, both the confirmed ship date and the confirmed receipt date should be updated accordingly.

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
New
18

Support the same batch selection functionality same time without maintaining minimum stock on the batch level

Issue:


  • The items have been configured to use the Same batch selection functionality hence as a prerequisite configuration the Batch level is marked as Coverage plan by dimension however while updating the Minimum coverage of an ite...

    Read more...

    1 Comments

    Read more... 1 Comments

    Category: Planning (324)

    STATUS DETAILS
    Needs Votes
    Ideas Administrator

    Thanks for your input! If it gets voted, we will consider adding it to our long term roadmap. 

    Sincerely, 

    Beatriz Nebot Gracia

    Product Manager, Microsoft

18

Create a new data entity in order to manage (safety stock) minimum/maximum keys in-mass

Dear Microsoft Team, Using the version 10.0.19, there is no standard way to export/import minimum/maximum keys in order to manage safety stock in item coverage cause there is no data entity out of the box. So idea is to create a new data entity in order to manage minimum/maximum keys in-mass i...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
18

Intercompany master planning fails if Coverage plan by dimension for ‘Batch number’ is enabled

In Storage dimension group, dimension Inventory status is marked as ‘Coverage plan by dimension’. When running intercompany plan, customer is getting an error: "A value for the required coverage planned storage dimension Batch number could not be found for product in company ***. No planned inte...

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
18

Gantt chart to check capacity reservations when changing resources

Currently, on Gantt-chart's Resource view, when changing one resource to another on scheduled production order, validation does not check finite capacity, but just returns infolog: "Gantt chart is OK". Change proposal: Add a new parameter to tell if Finite Capacity should be checked or not. If ...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
17

Ability to use Planning Optimization for some plans and not others

According to the Planning Optimization fit analysis documentation at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/supply-chain/master-planning/planning-optimization/planning-optimization-fit-analysis#overview-of-possible-results-from-the-fit-analysis, there are 20+ Planning Optimization features ...

Read more...

0 Comments

Read more... 0 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. Enabling control of planning engines per plan will not be possible without a larger redesign of core parts of both engines. Our current focus is to add additional capabilities to Planning Optimization to enabling additional customers to onboard. Hence, this is currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.

Sincerely,

Beatriz Nebot Gracia

PM, Microsoft

17

Let coverage group setting decide Marking behavior when firming planned orders

End users should not decide if marking should be created or not when firming a planned order. Typically it's the type of the item that should decide (stock items should NOT generate marking against receipt and make-to-order product should). Create a parameter on the coverage group level where it...

Read more...

1 Comments

Read more... 1 Comments

Category: Planning (324)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes