Kishore Melepati

1. Account payable << all vendors. 2. Activate the trading relationship. 3. Sales value mapping. 4. Accounts receivable << All Sales orders. Create the mode of delivery in usmf company. 6. Taken the standard item: T0012 . Select the first line, on the line details delivery type: Direct delivery. 8. Delivery type: Direct delivery and manage<< intercompany sale sorder. 9. Change the site:6 and warehouse:63. 10. Reserve the quantity for the first line. 11. Reserve the quantity second line. 12. Release to warehouse. 13. Load details. 14. Click on the original sales order. 15. Add the address on the customer accounts. 6. Update all lines and click ok. 17. Received an error message: more than one order lines is part of the same shipment or load shipment address cannot be updated. Actual Results: When we update the customer address on original sales order, we have received an error message: more than one order lines is part of the same shipment or load shipment address cannot be updated. Expected Results: Customer address should be updated without any errors.

1. Click on user options. 2. Change the language to polish “pl”. 3. Login to the emulator. Enter the username and password and click on login. 4. See the below some of the labels are not changed to polish language. Only one label has changed to polish language. Actual Results: When we change the language to polish on dynamics d365, if we check on the warehouse application some of the labels are changed to polish. Expected Results: when we change the language to polish on dynamics d365 it should be changed the warehouse application all labels to polish language.

A Sales Order is allowed to be processed when an inputted confirmed receipt date shouldn't allow a batch to be supplied based on the sellable days setup. This is because it is picking up the requested receipt date instead, which could be before the Confirmed receipt date. Sellable days should be based, firstly on: Confirmed Receipt Date and then the Requested Receipt Date.

Item withholding tax dropdown missing at procurement category form.

Workflow E-mail Notification setup as below 1. Purchase Requisition workflow 2. Setup 4 approvers in one of the approval step (Approve condition -Any on approver) 3. E-mail notification configured 4. Escalation Matrix set, Time limit 3 day (if time limit exceeds Auto Reject is configured) escalation manager/user is set For the above configuration, WF has been escalated since approvers are not taken action with in the time limit, in this case WF has been escalated and escalation manager is receiving notification 4 times instead of 1 time, which is causing junk in the e-mail box

When you configure a stocking limit for a Product X and location Y, it seems that Dynamics also looks to other products in that location. For instance, there is a stocking limit for Product X of 10 pieces in location Y. When there is a other product stored with quantity 5 in location Y, it will be part of the stocking limit. In other words, the stocking limit for a specific product and location is applied to all products in that location. See attachment for a video

Serial numbers and location is missing in intercompany process with credit notes. In the USMF the serial numbers are in the invent transactions but in the DEMF the serial numbers and the location are missing and the credit not cannot be posted. If there is a huge number of serial numbers it is a lot of work and mistakes can be made. Tested on contoso environment also 10.0.19 with the function credit note in the sales order.

When opening the work list in the new warehouse mangement app it will only show up to 10 work items, although more then 10 exists in the system. I know that you can change the maximum number of records via the mobile device menu item option, but I think this is not the solution. I thought that when you scroll down within the mobile device it should load the new work items.

A similar issue is described here: https://community.dynamics.com/ax/f/microsoft-dynamics-ax-forum/197297/intercompany-process-with-workflow/690250 We just want to know if this is a system limitation and confirm if there is no way to resolve it as answered by Andre in the forum.

1. Path: Procurement and sourcing << setup << procurement and sourcing parameters. 2. Activate the change management. 3. Vendor: 1002 has activated the change management. . Vendor:1001 doesn’t activate the change management. 5. Accounts payable << purchase orders << All purchase orderws. 6. Create purchase order with vendor:1001 does not activated the change management. 7. Created the purchase order. 8. Go to the header and change the vendor to 1002 which has activated the change management. And save the purchase order. 9. Vendor account has changed back to the 1001 vendor. Actual Results: We have created the purchase order with the vendor:1001 without activated change management. Go to the header and change the vendor:1002 activated change management the vendor should not changed. Expected Results: The user gets an information that the change from supplier without activated change management to the supplier with change management is not possible. The vendor:1001 should be changed to 1002 vendor.