Kishore Melepati

Description of the issue: End item is setup with a formula. In the formula line for the semi-finished item, “Inherit batch attributes to end item” is check marked. On the batch of the semi-finished item a value is entered for a batch attribute. A production order is created for the end item with this batch for the semi-finished item. End item is report as finished using WMS app. It is expected that the batch attribute is inherited from the semi-finished item to the end item. If we do first post the picking list journal and then report as finish the end-item, the batch attributes are inherited. However, our customer way of working is that for a production order every pallet is reported as finished using the WMS app. Only when all pallets are produced, it is known how much semi-finished product has been used in this production order. A very common business process in manufacturing.

Description of problem: How can you change the destination warehouse when completing the quarantine order. When we generate a journal arrival item from Quaratine Order (to move Item in a different Wharehouse) where we change the original WharehouseID and we post it the system always use the original warehouse.

Record templates for [Released Products] are not working correctly since upgrade to 10.0.12. We have many record templates to assist with creating new products. Some of the templates, but not all, now appear to have important fields such as [Item Model Group] missing data in the template. Example record template: FG-087 The question we wish considered further is how/why has this happened and is it likely to happen again when we upgrade ?

I think it should be possible also for multiple license plates to be moved if there is work connected. Also there mustn't be any other inventory on the location for this error to occur.

The PO header has two separate fields: [Direct delivery] and [Intercompany direct delivery] But SO header has only one. The field is labeled as "Direct delivery" but the actual field name is "Intercompany direct delivery". When you create a direct delivery PO from a sales order, field [Direct delivery] on PO header is properly populated. But if SO has [Direct delivery] field also marked, then [Intercompany direct delivery] field on the PO header is also marked. Expected situation: There should have been two fields on the Sales order header and customer: [Direct delivery], [Intercompany direct delivery]. Application should allow marking the intercompany one only when the customer and the sales order are really intercompany. The field [Intercompany direct delivery] on the PO header should be populated only if the corresponding SO header has [Intercompany direct delivery] is marked.

Once items on purchase order have been receipt in the inbound dock, we would like to perform a move inventory operation to another location. Note that there are already pick and put-away to location works associated with these items. Error message: Error: The inventory quantity doesn't appear on the screen and when we try to input the quantity we have the error - Invalid quantity Repro steps: Create a purchase order with one item. Receive the item via a mobile device. (Menu item: Purchase order item receiving) The item should now be in the dock with associated work. Perform a move operation. (Mode: Work Movement by template ) Its scenario one from the link below: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/supply-chain/warehousing/move-inventory-associated-work Note: Worker was granted 'Allow movement of inventory with work associated'

Description of problem: RMA receive process the mobile device is by default showing inventory UOM. The user has to change this to order UOM every time. This causes lot of errors in receiving transactions and also involves extra efforts. The requirement here is that the mobile device should show order UOM by default in customer return process (RMA).

When a multiple and a maximum are set in the default order settings for an item, for example a maximum sales order quantity of 50 and a multiple of 5, then there is a issue when entering a quantity of for example 60 on a sales order line. Error message: The message "The order quantity must be a multiple of 5. Do you want to round up the order quantity to 55" will show when entering a quantity of 60. 60 is a multiple of 5, so we would not expect to get this question at all

In any scenario it was possible for a user B to overwrite a checkout (and thus to delete the hold, i.e. to execute the clear holds function) created by user A. Partner question: is it possible to prevent users other than the one who created the hold from overwriting the hold?

For our Client: VeeTee Rice, Some work of type Raw material picking cannot be completed, for which the system errors: "Quantity 400.00 cannot be picked because stock transactions with status On order, Reserved ordered or Reserved physical are insufficient." It is strange because the quantity reserved for the order matches exactly the requirement. We have debugged the class InventUpd_Picked>updatePickMore and it seems that the system is mistakenly trying to find the InventTrans for a different order. This happens intermittently and we cannot find a reason or a solution.