• 16

    Multiple Funding Source - Project invoice proposal (PIP's) not creating correctly

    Suggested by Narasimha Rao PV New  0 Comments

    Reference :https://fix.lcs.dynamics.com/Issue/Details?bugId=972053&dbType=3&qc=47fdff712904d4b6cebb6830e4b4dac697a696ef4aed5e150e991a9af256f41f.


    *** [REPRO STEPS] ***


    Tested In “GBSI” Legal entity

    1.Go to Accounts Receivable>> Customers >> All customers

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

    create 4 customers as Test 01, Test02, Test03, Test04.

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated


    2.Project management accounting>> Projects >> Project contracts


    Create Project contract as Test

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

    Funding source as Test01 with GBP currency.

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated


    In Funding source need to select all created customers


    In Funding Rules select Allocation and in Funding rule allocations select

    Test01-40 check box selected, Test02-20, Test03-20, Test04-20


    3.Go to Project management and accounting>> Projects>>All Projects

    Create a Project as Test and customer account as Test01,start date as 1st October.

    Select the Project ID and keep the project in process stage.

    4.Project management>>Setup>>Timesheets>>All delegates


    Click New and select Resource and delegate as Admin start date as 1st oct2024.


    5.Project management accounting>>Time sheets >>all Time sheets


    Select the line


    Need to give for 2hours for 5days total 10hours from 7th oct to 11th oct.

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

    submit workflow .

    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated


    6.Accounts receivable >>customers >>All customers

    select Test 01


    under credit and collections need to drop down and select invoice.


    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated


    7.Project management and accounting>>Projects>> Allprojects


    select the project and select Manage and click on Invoice Proposal


    select all we can see project transactions as 2hours for 5days.

    we can see 3 MIP are created for Test02,Test03,Test04



    Open Test02



    invoice proposal transaction lines able to see one line with invoice line 140 and In Hour lines we can see only one line with 2 hours and Line amount as 140


    Open Test03


    we can see invoice proposal transaction we can see only one line with invoice line 140 and In Hour line 2hours with Invoice line amount 140.


    Open Test04


    Invoice proposal line we can see one line amount as 1820 but in Hours Multiple lines are created with different invoice amount and Hours compared to Test 02 and Test03 customers.


    A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated


    Actual Result: We can see for Test04 customer has multiple Hour lines are created when we had given allocation percentage for Test 02-20,Test03-20,Test04-20.


    Expected Result: When in allocation Rules had given equal percentage to Test02-20, Test03-20, Test04-20, customers It should show equal hours and Invoice line amount for All customers



  • 16

    Support K Records When Generating an Electronic File for 1099s

    Suggested by Emily Stockton New  0 Comments

    K records are somewhat of a new thing when it comes to filing your 1099s. Near the end of the file, K records will be categorized by state code. Currently, D365 doesn't support including this data in the out of the box export file (Accounts payable > Periodic tasks > Tax 1099 > Vendor Settlement for 1099s > Create export file).


    I'm proposing that K records be supported when creating an export file within F&O. The system could group values by using the codes configured in the "Combined federal/state filing codes" screen.


    Many clients require K records to be included when filing 1099s, so I think this could be a very valuable addition.


  • 16

    Malaysia eInvoicing - self billed invoices - non-foreign vendor scenario is not currently supported

    Suggested by Katie Nguyen New  0 Comments

    There are scenarios where transactions are involved with individuals (local vendors who are not conducting a business) which requires for self-billing as well. It will be NRIC or Passport for such vendors as Business Registration Number. This is a valid scenario which needs to be supported.


  • 16

    Expiration date on Lease header used as blocking point for transactions on payment and executory costs schedule lines

    Suggested by Konstantina Knikeli New  0 Comments

    The idea is that the Lease expiration/end date on General fast tab in Leases is also applied on both payment schedule lines and executory costs schedule payment lines.

    Users should be able to maintain lease start date & lease expiry date in the lease master in MSD, but still should not have a payment line start date with a date beyond lease expiry date. That way the system restricts any payment which has a date plotted after lease expiry date thus acquiring better control in lease accounting & master data.


  • 16

    Tax Credit note compliant with UAE legal requirements

    Suggested by Marcello Cagliani New  0 Comments

    Hello, the Tax Credit note issue by D365 FFO for UAE (United Arab Emirates) is not compliant with the fiscal regulation of the country.


    In accordance with local fiscal requirements, the tax credit note must include details of both the original value of supply and the corrected value of supply for each lines and the totals. This is not possible with the standard solution, as confirmed by you in the support ticket TrackingID#2405290050003222 and also by our local partner.


    We suggest to verify the UAE requirement and make the process compliant with the law, by adapting the Invoice data provideer and report Layout accordling.


    Thank you

    Best Regards

    Marcello Cagliani


  • 16

    Display "Reconcile amount origin" - but view accounting is not available for all the source (Sales order/Project -Invoiced on-accounts)

    Suggested by Sreedhar Burgula New  2 Comments

    The view accounting from posted sales tax isn’t being for all source of transactions:

    Its source = Sales Order / Voucher / Project we cannot see the view accounting.


    DETAILS:

    Setup available on sales tax code if you have the marginal base = “Net amount of invoice balance” and origine = “Percentage of net amount” 

    But if we try to open view accounting for sales order transactions, information isn’t display.

    View accounting is displayed for transaction source = Free text invoice

    View accounting isn’t displayed for transaction source = sales order

    We would like to access view accounting for all type of source (Sales order/Project -Invoiced on-accounts)


    User Impact:

    User: The user will pay for the last document saved from the approval journal and this voucher isn’t displayed.

    The original document is not available on the posted sales tax form, this makes challenging in Finance part on the Business.



  • 16

    Importing a prepayment invoice without activating the "automatically create invoice lines" feature

    Suggested by Charlotte Toupin New  0 Comments

    Our client uses an OCR solution coupled with the vendor invoice automation feature in D365 for supplier invoicing. All vendor invoices are sent to the OCR app including prepayment invoice.

    The integration utilizes two standard data entities: Vendor Invoice Header and Vendor Invoice Lines (without any customization).

    The checkbox “Automatically create invoice lines” isn’t enabled because our client wants to import vendor invoice lines based on OCR reading and apply a three-way matching in D365. In France, the purchase invoice takes precedence and must be recorded even if it is not equal to its purchase order.

    Solution proposed is only to enable “Automatically create invoice lines” but there is no solution to import prepayment invoice when this checkbox isn't activated.



  • 16

    Request to remove the unnecessary error message , "Vendor Account field must be filled in" when creating a new vendor.

    Suggested by Marta Nogalska New  4 Comments

    When creating a new vendor, an error from the system appears, but nevertheless it is possible to create a vendor and find it in the list.

    The error appears only if the user, after logging into the system, has expanded the tab ,,Retail" when creating a new vendor.

     

    If the user collapses the tab ,,Retail" and then logs out of the system and logs in, then during the process of creating a new vendor the error ..Error: Field Vendor account must be filled in" will not appear.

    It seems that there is some connection between filling in Vendor Account and Name fields when creating a new vendor.


    Repro Steps:

    1. Log in to D365

    2. Go to Go to Accounts payable/Vendors/All vendors

    3. Click New

    4. Check if the ,,Retail" tab is expanded

    5. If the ,,Retail,, tab is not expanded then expand it, log out of the system and log in again

    6.Go to Go to Accounts payable/Vendors/All vendors

    7. Click New

    8. Fill in the ,,Vendor Account" field

    9. Fill in the ,,Name" field

    10. Select vendor group

    11.Click Save

    12 Check if the message ,,Field Vendor account must be filled in." appears at the top


    Installed product version : 10.0.38 (10.0.1777.56)

    Installed platform version : Update62 (7.0.7120.49)




  • 16

    Delegation taking account of HR hierarchies

    Suggested by Kirsty Craig New  0 Comments

    If a user is going on holiday, they are encouraged to set up a delegation for their workflows.

    This causes issues if they select someone who is below them in workflow approvals hierarchies.


    A drop down list of delegations who fit the required approval hierarchy levels from the HR module would be useful to avoid workflows falling over due to a lack of approval rights.


  • 16

    Singapore GST F5 report process enhancement for Singapore localization

    Suggested by Marco Pham New  0 Comments

    When an importer (D365 customer) imports goods to Singapore, the GST (Goods and Service Tax) must be paid to the Tax Authority, 2 scenarios regarding the GST payment:

    1. GST is paid indirectly by courier (CNF agent) on behalf of the importer.
    2. GST is paid directly to the Tax authority by importer.


    Currently the system does not fully support the automatic process for recording such GST transaction, we would have to carry out the following procedures:


    1. For CNF GST payment, we would need to use the landed cost function to fully record all the charges (Tax, Goods, ...) and amounts for involved parties.
    2. For direct payment, customer would need to use a workaround, which involved creating a minimum amount expense line in a journal which contains the Actual Sales tax amount, and later reverse the expense to keep the Sales tax, which is very inconvenient given that in large companies this process is carried out at an accelerated rate.


    Going the given route Customer must edit the amount manually with a lot of steps and adjustment, it is demanded that the functionality should be possible for this to be calculated automatically and posted with least amount of manual intervention.


    We requested that a functionality be made for customer/importer to be able to input, calculate, post and journal the GST and related amounts automatically at Purchase Order creation, at the same time suiting the scenarios mentioned above.