• 353

    Vendor invoice number – the field is too short, there is only 20 signs (digits) available.

    Suggested by Monika Kowalka Completed  29 Comments

    It would be nice to extend the Invoice Id to at least 30 length. It's not country specific, but world wide need. Unfortunately, Shorter number (what means wrong number of the invoice) will be reflected in bookings and in SAF-T file (XML files required by the Authority in Poland). Manual workaround exists, to manually correct the SAF-T file before sending to government, but this is not a good approach because still the wrong number is in the system and is not the same like on reports send to tax authority which can effect on penalties as well. From July 2019 there is an addition to the regulations of the information reported in SAF-T files, stating that if information is incorrect there is a charge of 500 PLN for each mistake.


  • 203

    Add Accruals Scheme to Pending Invoices

    Suggested by Henrik Larsen Completed  6 Comments

    In the pending invoices screen is should be possible, as it is in the invoice approval screen, to select an accruals scheme that allows an invoice to be distributed across a number of periods. Ideally, it should be possible to select the scheme on line level.


  • 173

    Enable the Electronic reporting format destinations dialog box that appears when a free text invoice is posted on ALL business documents

    Suggested by Ahmad El Abbassi Completed  5 Comments

    There can be specific scenarios where a business document needs to use a specific destination than those destinations that were configured for the running ER format. Example: On the Electronic Reporting destination page, we have used the email purpose "Invoice" on the customer card to be used for sending out Sales order invoices and Sales order confirmations. For some transactions, there can be specific scenarios where you would like to overrule/overwrite your ER destination setup, by either sending the document to a different email recipient or using a totally different ER destination. A suggestion to solve this issue is to Enable the Electronic reporting format destinations dialog box that appears when a free text invoice is posted on Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable related business documents as a new feature. The Free text invoice forces ER to offer a dialog box presenting the option to edit destinations when they were configured for the running format. ER already supports this opportunity, so why not implement the same dialog box on all business documents.

  • 161

    Ledger settlement -> remaining accounting amount automatically posted to exchange rate/loss account

    Suggested by Gerben Mulder Completed  10 Comments

    Currently it is not possible to settle two transactions (General ledger -> periodic -> Ledger settlement) when the transactions amount (for example €) is net-zero and the accounting currency (for example USD) isn't zero. First transaction: +€100 = +$111 Second transaction:. -€100 = -$109 Actually D365 should settle these transactions and post the realized exchange rate gain/loss automatically to one of the main accounts which have been setup in the Accounts for currency revaluation (general ledger -> ledger setup -> ledger)

  • 143

    'Vendor balance list' with wrong main account

    Suggested by Maria E. Completed  8 Comments

    The report ‘Vendor balance list’ (Accounts payable > Reports > Status) display the wrong main account, if the vendor Group was changed. Then the ‘Vendor balance list’ do not display the ‘Vendor balance’ of the vendor transactions. Instead, the main account from the ‘Vendor posting profil’ will display.
    The same issue arises with ‘customer balance list’ too.


  • 145

    Currency revaluation different profit/loss exchange rate account by module

    Suggested by Annaik Boudin Completed  7 Comments

    Revaluation accounts are the same whatever the module from which Revaluation is run. Different ledger accounts for Profit/loss exchange rate should be based on module. (Account payable, Account Receivable, General ledger (monetary and non monetary)

  • 144

    Sales tax registration numbers in multiple European countries in one legal entity

    Suggested by Jasper Schram Completed  17 Comments

    Companies in Europe can have warehouses in multiple countries. Examples are consignment stock at a customer, toll manufacturers in another country or just having a warehouse close to the customers to have the shortest possible delivery times. These customers typically do not have a business / legal entity in those countries. Since there is free movement of goods in the European Union, this occurs more and more. Also with the product growing rapidly towards the enterprise market we see more and more customers with warehouses in different member states of the European Union. In most cases within the European Union, you must register for sales tax in that specific country if you ship goods to and sell from a foreign warehouse. An example. A Dutch company has a manufacturing plant in the Netherlands, but they also have a warehouse in Southern Germany to be able to deliver to every destination in Europe within a day's truck drive. In this case the company is legally located in the Netherlands, but they hold sales tax registration numbers in both the Netherlands and Germany. This leads to the following scenario's. If they replenish the German warehouse using a transfer order this has to be declared for both Intrastat and Sales tax. Intrastat functionality supports the transfer order. However the transfer order is no input for sales tax declaration nor EU sales list. The goods are moved from their Dutch Sales tax registration number to their German Sales tax registration number. If they continue to sell to a German company from the German warehouse this has to be calculated as domestic German sales tax and they have to register and declare this on their German Sales tax number. Current functionality is not able to determine the correct Sales tax group based on the customer master data. This customer has been setup to be serviced from the Dutch warehouse, so the setup on the customer master will trigger a sales tax calculation as if the goods were shipped from the Netherlands to Germany. The sales tax group has to be changed manually which comes with a big risk on picking the wrong value or just forgetting to think about changing the value. It would be ideal if the sales tax group would also be determined by the location of the warehouse where the goods are shipped from. If they sell to an Austrian company from the German warehouse, this has to be calculated as a German EU trade transaction, to be declared on the German Sales Tax number and the German EU sales list at the German tax authority. However, by default this customer has been setup for shipment from the Dutch warehouse. Despite the fact that we are able to setup multiple tax authorities in the system, this doesn't tick all the requirement boxes. A lot of sales tax settings are on the legal entity level and not on the sales tax authority level. An example is conditional sales tax, this means sales tax has to be declared when the invoices are paid. This applies for France and can only be set on a legal entity level. Another example is the EU sales list. This is based on the list of countries as specified in the foreign trade parameters. However, if a country is domestic, "other EU member state" or "rest of the world" can only be set up from the point of view of the legal entity address whereas the legal entity is located in multiple countries for the sales tax. Sales tax and intrastat functionality is supported by localizations that are enabled on the legal entity level. This mean that a Dutch company can only use the Dutch localization features for sales tax and intrastat functionality and declarations. This means that they lack the functionality to electronically declare sales tax, EU sales list and Intrastat in all other countries apart from the Netherlands. Finally, scenario's in which the goods are shipped from another country then the country in which the legal entity has it's primary address are not supported well. Sales tax is dependent on the country which the goods are shipped from, the country where the goods are shipped to and the delivery term. The functionality is highly needed on sales and purchase orders. Projects would also be nice, but this is a less common scenario. A basic overview of the requested functionality would be - Be able to setup multiple Sales tax registration numbers so the correct number can be mentioned on the sales orders, most likely on the sales tax settlement period or the tax authority - Correct determination of the sales tax group on purchase and sales order lines based on the country where the goods are shipped from, country which the goods are shipped to and the delivery term. Also the list code should be determined based on these parameters to ensure a correct EU sales list - Adjust the summary update parameters to prevent sending out an invoice with sales tax calculated for multiple sales tax registration numbers - Move some of the sales tax settings and localization features from the legal entity level to the tax authority level. An example is conditional sales tax on the sales tax tab of general ledger parameters. - Move almost all settings from the foreign trade parameters in the tax module to a lowel level to be able to support multiple EU sales lists and intrastat declarations from one legal entity I am more than happy to discuss further details and to participate in the next steps. Kinds regards, Jasper Schram


  • 143

    Description in voucher transaction is only showing the first line from free text invoice.

    Suggested by AX Administrator Completed  4 Comments

    If the user split an invoice into several lines for differentiation purpose, voucher transaction does not mirror the text invoice line. It would be great that voucher transaction can be generated regarding text invoice lines amount, invoice text and tax amount. Norwegian companies use to send invoices electronically where text invoice lines works fine. The issue is that the Voucher transaction does not update the description of invoice text so when the LedgerJournalTrans exported to database (BYOD) it is not clear enough.

  • 135

    Bank statement reconciliation report

    Suggested by Annaick Boudin Completed  11 Comments

    Advanced bank reconciliation has been designed but no bank statement report provides clear information.

    Bank statement report is required base on cutoff date. This report should have option to detail

    * reconciled transactions

    * Un-reconciled transactions

    Customer should be able to have a statement at date of what is in his bank account for Audit, cash management, management decision.


  • 141

    direct view of main account postings

    Suggested by Kristi Slininger Completed  7 Comments

    When looking for an GL-account, for example in General ledger > accounts > main accounts there is no possibility in Operations furthermore to directly have a look on the postings. Instead a time consuming trial balance has to be run (for all accounts) before the account can be selected to view the transactions. From the technical point of view this may be ok. But from the view of an accountant not. An accountant needs the possibility to quickly access the transactions of a main account like he could in former Ax-Versions.