-
Fixed asset created from purchase order should retrieved the default book not the first one in alphabetical order
Fixed asset created from purchase order does not retrieved the default book. It retrieves the first book in alphabetical order. I would be nice that this was not so "random", and that system would take the default book when creating a new PO, to make the process easier and more straight forward.
-
GST rates on gate outward form from tax setup rates
As per the GST rules, material / capital assets send for the job work process at that time on delivery challan GST amount must be shown But GST should not be pay to government, as rules said that GST liability will be there only if material / capital assets send for the job work not returned within the time line prescribed by the government. User requirement is just to calculate GST on gate outward form, there is no posting required in ledger for GST. There will be no accounting treatment required. There is one GST return called ITC-04, where we need to furnished details of inputs or capital goods dispatched or received from a job worker in a particular quarter. The user requirement for this post is specifically for Fixed assets in Gate outward form having reference document type “RGP”, where we select fixed assets item code and create Returnable gate pass in the system but as per the GST rules GST information must be mentioned in Delivery challan document print and on Gate outward form there is no provision to calculate GST. -
BEL: Payment ID not updating in the vendor payment journal when user manually select the transaction on "settle transactions"
When we manually create a line in a payment journal: I have enabled payment ID options in the Method of Payment ( for the SEPA payment (ISO20022)). If a payment ID is specified on the invoice when creating the invoice journal. The payment ID field in the payment journal is then updated with the payment ID that was specified when creating the invoice. If a payment ID is not specified on the invoice when creating the invoice journal à The payment ID field is filled in with the invoice number that was specified when creating the invoice journal (This is already done when we use “Payment proposal”, but we would like it to act the same when we add a line manually to the vendor payment journal). I would suggested and request to fix this requirement in the future releases with this expected results. Payment ID should be populated when selecting Settle transactions as reflected in using the Payment Proposal. -
Usage of Letter of Guarantee in cash and bank management module
As we are well aware the usage of Letter of Guarantee is only from AP and AR module while creating a PO/SO as a support document for the banks to release funds from the bank facility to fulfil their regular business operations. IDEA: Instead of PO/SO system should have an option to avail the bank facility by representing a Post Dated Cheque/Negotiable Financial Instrument/ Bonds as a Guarantee to Bank to utilize the facility funds. We have a New(creation) option under Bank Facility Form which is disabled without any functionality, hope we can use this option for Bank Cheques as a support document to utilize the facility funds and complete functionality process under letter of guarantee. Thank you! -
Description in voucher transaction is only showing the first line from free text invoice.
If the user split an invoice into several lines for differentiation purpose, voucher transaction does not mirror the text invoice line. It would be great that voucher transaction can be generated regarding text invoice lines amount, invoice text and tax amount. Norwegian companies use to send invoices electronically where text invoice lines works fine. The issue is that the Voucher transaction does not update the description of invoice text so when the LedgerJournalTrans exported to database (BYOD) it is not clear enough. -
Ability to schedule a batch for payment advise to be generated in Batch ( This should not be Journal specific)
It would be nice to have a periodic task that allows us to send out the payment advice to vendors on a weekly basis. Presently we can configure the payment advice to be generated in batch, however, it is journal specific. Let us say we have created payment 10 payment journals for the current week and all the lines of these payment journals are in status sent. It would be nice to have a periodic batch job that enables us the selection of the payment journal and we can schedule the batch to have the payment advice generated for all the payment journals selected at once. -
Add an option to explode sub BOM items that have [Auto-report as finished] into separate BOM journals
Scenario:
- While processing BOM journal for a finished product item that has semi-finished products (Sub BOM) that could have [Auto-report as finished] enabled, currently the system is either consuming the semi-finished products or if there is no on-hand then it explodes their raw material ingredients.
Idea:
- Add an option to explode sub BOM items that have [Auto-report as finished] into separate/Multiple BOM journals.
Challenges:
- In such a scenario where the semi-finished product is [Auto-report as finished] enabled then the semi-finished product will never be consumed but instead their raw material. This will impact the financial entry posting as semi-finished inventory accounts will not be affected while in real business the posting profile of semi-finished products should be used.
- Since the semi-finished items won't be reported as finished, the users will not be able to provide reports about the semi-finished products that have been produced.
Workaround:
- The possible workaround is either allowing negative on the semi-finished product through item model group or on the warehouse level so the system will post separate/Multiple BOM journals.
-
fixed exchange rate for both posting purchase receipt / invoice
It would be nice to have the feature of setting a fixed exchange rate in the Purchase Order. We understand the feature was recently introduced for PO >Invoice, SO & FTI (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/business-applications-release-notes/april19/dynamics365-finance-operations/new-fixed-exrate) but excluded PO.
-
Reverse transaction - reason comment
Customer posted a ledger transaction and reversed the same with the reason comment while reversing transaction. However, customer unable to find the comments updated while reversing the transaction in voucher transactions view and in reverse tracing view. And also tried to insert the column but unable to find the field for reason comments updated.
Customer was not able to find the Reversal reason field. After thorough investigation at table level, we found that currently there is no standard field available which can be added out of the box.
The reason this field is not available in standard because reason code is not mandatory and is an optional field. However, it would be very helpful if the reason comment is available to see in any of the view details of the voucher to identify the reversal reasons on any report. Hence request to add this to the table level wherein it can be added/inserted to the document view.
-
Please align fields as in all prev. AX versions
The customer is facing an issue with the field groups in Dynamics/Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management/Manufacturing and production/Issues with production and batch orders. They want the fields to be aligned as in all previous AX versions
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
