• 1

    Sales shipment analysis report which is available in China is required for other countries (US,EMEA) as well.

    Suggested by Sathish Kumar Venkataraman New  0 Comments

    The Sales shipment analysis report which is exclusively available in China is required for other markets as well.

    As this report gives out only generic information in a detailed view like what has been shipped against what has been ordered along with the amount, not sure why this report is localized only to China but we would like to have this accessible for other markets as well (Like US, EMEA, etc.)


    The sales shipment analysis report is available under the following path,

    Inventory Management > Inquiries & Reports > Reports (China) > Sales shipment analysis.


    Please can this be confirmed if it is planned in the future roadmap? (or) is there any way that we could access this report in other markets?




  • 1

    PARTIAL POSTING SHOULD BE ALLOWE IN INVENTORY/PROJECT JOURNAL POSTING

    Suggested by Ganesh Shirsat New  0 Comments

    PARTIAL POSTING SHOULD BE ALLOWE IN INVENTORY/PROJECT JOURNAL POSTING


  • 1

    Transactions Form - Open with no loaded data (Similar to On-Hand)

    Suggested by Matt Pedersen New  0 Comments

    Due to the nature of the Transactions Form, it will open with all transactions and take too long to open.


    Suggested change is to act similarly to the On-Hand List Form where it opens without data and allows the user to filter for data. While a view is available, it is difficult to work with users who do not have one pinned as default and it takes 30+ minutes to load.


  • 1

    Save Setup in Print outs

    Suggested by Bheru Singh M New  0 Comments

    Save setup button to be enabled for reports


  • 1

    Add AX:Form/InventSummaryFormInPeriod_CN function to D365FO

    Suggested by Takashi Nakagawa New  0 Comments

    My customer stronglyI requests that D365FO to add the same function as the "Shipping / Receiving summary (Form/InventSummaryInPeriod_CN)" screen that was provided on the "On-hand inventory" screen of AX2012.


  • 1

    Maintenance requests notes ability extension

    Suggested by Emma Bai New  0 Comments

    When user add note to maintenance request, the cursor stays at end of the notes. But if user has multiple time stamps, then the cursor will be far away from the newly added one. It's not convenient for user to add comments to current timestamp.




  • 1

    Inventory Status BOM Released Product (Bug?)

    Suggested by Nick Laenen New  1 Comments

    While adding a bill of material to a released product, we are able to specify the 'inventory status' which should be used for a specific BOM line. Once we create a production order for this item (based on the BOM line with non-default inventory status specified), the BOM of the production order does not automatically use the defined inventory status.


    So, we are able to specify the intventory status on the BOM line of a released product, but this is not cpoied correctly into the production order. In my opinion this is a bug instead of an idea...


  • 1

    Change the inventory status dimension based on a change to the Tag Disposition Code.

    Suggested by Nilesh Mahure New  0 Comments

    The inventory status dimension is not updated when the current disposition code is changed.


    Business scenario: The system is set up to accept soft reservations. The soft reservation hierarchy is set up to look down to the inventory status level, which is "available" for all products on quality hold. The tag disposition code is not taken into account by the system during the release to warehousing process.


    If the disposition code was set to "Hold," the batch task should update the inventory status dimension to "Hold" to prevent the warehousing process from being released.


  • 1

    Inventory posting to have Financial dimensions checking even though cost amount is 0

    Suggested by Dimitri Ong New  0 Comments

    During the posting of Movement journal, if the cost amount is 0, there will be no account structure validation. (Financial dimension checking). It is due to the current design, no financial posting in ledger will not trigger the account structure validation.


    Suggest to have the account structure validation enabled even though cost amount is 0. So that the posted amount after recalculation can be categories in the exact financial dimension setup.


  • 1

    In Landed cost module - Voyage id number sequence should be legal entity specific.

    Suggested by Balaram NA New  0 Comments

    Currently the voyage id has shared number sequence across all legal entities.


    This is not the ideal behavior to have the number sequences shared across entities which will lead to inconsistent voyage numbers across entities.


    Request to implement the future, where the voyage id number sequence can be used as legal entity specific.