web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
  • Wrong financial cost updates on the Return sales Order invoice posting

    Issue description – Return Sales order invoice posting with an incorrect cost. The financial cost posted for a registered batch number for return was mixed with other batch number costs from the original sales order. So after invoicing the wrong cost updated. E.g. 1. Sales order with 100 qty Packing slip and invoice. B1 – Qty 10 – Financial Cost 150 $ B2 – Qty 10 – Financial Cost 250 $ B2 – Qty 80 – Financial Cost 2000 $ 2. Return sales order created for 90 qty and Registered B2 batch number and invoiced. But financial cost updated as – B2 - 80 qty - 2000$. B2 - 10 qty - 150 $ ( Instead of 250$) Total return order invoiced cost updated as 2150 $ for 90 qty. Actual result - The Partial wrong batch order cost was selected during financial cost posting during invoicing the return sales order. Expected Result - The correct registered batch number cost should be selected and posted in return sales order invoice posting. Note - Sales order posting with multiple batch numbers was a very common scenario across the industries. So return sales order must support and post correct cost updates during invoicing.
  • Change the inventory status dimension based on a change to the Tag Disposition Code.

    The inventory status dimension is not updated when the current disposition code is changed.


    Business scenario: The system is set up to accept soft reservations. The soft reservation hierarchy is set up to look down to the inventory status level, which is "available" for all products on quality hold. The tag disposition code is not taken into account by the system during the release to warehousing process.


    If the disposition code was set to "Hold," the batch task should update the inventory status dimension to "Hold" to prevent the warehousing process from being released.

  • System consider double dot's .. as between syntax instead of single item - Issues with Planning Optimization with Item Number having 2 periods

    Planning optimization runs for individual parts with 2 periods in their part numbering generate an error "No items were part of this planning run. This might be due to an incorrect or non-existing item number or other criteria specified on the filter. Please check the filter criteria under Records to include FastTab in the master planning run dialog and in the Plan Filter on the master plan itself.”


    1. Planning Optimization turned ON
    2. Go to a released product that has ".." in the item number of the part -ESRT733 2..125X20
    3. Go to PLAN in the upper header of the released product
    4. Go to Net requirements for that item
    5. Click on ' Update' in the upper left corner of the net requirements screen
    6. Pick plan - either MTO or MTS ok
    7. Click on "Master planning"
    8. Master planning screen pops up - click OK
    9. Plan history Log Error screen pop up occurs

    Error : “ No items were part of this planning run. This might be due to an incorrect or non-existing item number or other criteria specified on the filter. Please check the filter criteria under Records to include FastTab in the master planning run dialog and in the Plan Filter on the master plan itself.”

     

     

    Expected behavior - No error popup when planning optimization run and planned orders should be generated.