Forecast consumption by transactions (configured products need this) not working when phantoms


The following is a serious gap in the solution: When we forecast configured product demand, we use allocation keys to get a forecast to be managed on an option level. This option is represented by a part number that I have given a percentage. When this part number is a phantom, the forecast cons...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Planning (220)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Purchase agreement improvements


1.We really need a screen that shows all Purchase agreement lines that exist. That way we can find out relatively quickly whether an item is in any Purchase agreement OR 2.Add a new menu to the released product action area Purchasing, just like we have for Trade Agreements, where I can look up wh...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Procurement and Sourcing (705)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

No more "Marked for Deletion" in WrkCtrCapRes


CURRENT FUNCTIONALITY: A prod order in status Released, where picking work has been created , will get “marked for deletion” for all capacity reservations” after I run scheduling while open picking work exists. The user thinks this is capacity reservation “on the way ou...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Planning (220)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Send warning when personalizing certain fields that should not be personalized


A user can personalize any field. yet there is trouble when the user takes fields that are controlled by Dimension display, for example. or when the user starts personalizing the Job card Terminal screen that has its own column display setup feature. As soon as the dimension display changes or t...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: User Experience (336)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Regular warehousing and production really need this


When I create production order picklist journals (using reqular warehousing) a sore point is that the system does not care whether I have inventory or not. My picking list gets everything in the PROD BOM and only after evaluate I will find out which items can actually be picked. There is no way ...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Production Control (342)

STATUS DETAILS
Declined

Personalization moving fields


The personalization needs improvement. When trying to move a field the user always faces a lengthy process if you use drag and drop. I know the arrow keys work better. But the drag and drop is painful. You need many attempts to finally get the field in place. Users also need time to figure out y...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: User Experience (336)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Quality functionality needs roadmap


Quality management and control is functionality that has barely changed in 10 years. The Inventory status of adv warehousing was integrated with Quality orders, we lost the quarantine order but I can't remember much innovation . There are fundamental gaps in Quality and we have so far customized ...

Read more...
1 Comments

Read more...
1 Comments

Category: Inventory (493)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Quality order sampling


THe new feature Quality order for whs processes is a great initiative but it contains one big mistake. Sample testing is misconceived seriously. When I test 10 EA of a total lot of 100 EA I decide what to do with the entire 100 EA. A sample symbolizes the total lot. With this feature, the quantit...

Read more...
1 Comments

Read more...
1 Comments

Category: Warehouse Management (673)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Firming a planned PO to an existing PO


The PO field on the planned Purchase order is a nice feature to firm to existing PO's. But the field is as good as un-usable. It shows ALL po's in the world instead of filtering on the vendor and on the status being "open' to even allow a new line. This has to be changed promptly. In addition t...

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Planning (220)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Alerts not available on Purchase agreement header or line fields


We want alerts on the expiry date of a PUrchase Agreement. THe alert feature is available for the purch agreement but you cannot choose any fields. This makes the alert unusable. One should be able to choose fields on header or line. That is the idea. Just like alerts everywhere else.

Read more...
0 Comments

Read more...
0 Comments

Category: Procurement and Sourcing (705)

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes