324
Customers and partners have been asking for all table fields to be available on all pages to add without customization vie personalize (or in on premise Show Columns) for at last 15 years now,

Can you please make all related table fields available to users to be added via personalize vs having to create an extension to add existing stock fields to pages. This way customers can add fields they need without having to pay a partner to write and add an extension to add fields to pages.
Category: Development
STATUS DETAILS
Under Review
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. We are considering adding it to our longer term roadmap. 
 
Your help is greatly appreciated, 
The Business Central team

Comments

K

In version 17 some important fields disappeared from the item card: 'Allow negative stock' and 'stock warning', who did that???!!! And they are not added to personilization also????????

Category: Development

K

This would take the burden from the developers, in order to efficiently use time and resources for the features that bring benefit to the business. Highly required by Customers

Category: Development

K

Hi There,

This need to be developed asap. It has been a pain in the a** for al the years i have been working with NAV/BC especially now in BC were its harder to add the standard fields to the screen!

Category: Development

K

This is needed - and urgently. I am constantly getting mind blown by the number of fields I would see as standard as a finance end user that cannot be pulled onto windows or reports.

If you have to stage things, start with the most widely used windows like General Ledger Entries, Vendor Ledger Entries, Sales Ledger Entries.

Category: Development

K

This is a great idea, customers and end-users should be able to add fields they were used to see in older versions of NAV that are "hidden" in BC. For example, Ship-to Address and Ship-to City in the Posted Sales Shipments List, that info is important to some companies for statistical or other reasons.

Category: Development

K

One of the best ideas here.

Category: Development

K

There is really a lake of customization. For example, in opportunities list, we can add the field "Contact Company No." Mmmmmh, who car about the "Contact No"? A normal sales person want to see the company name.

Same with Cusomters. You can add the "postal code", but what people want to see is the "city name".

In my opinion, only a developer think this way (allowing only to add the ID of a record). A end user need speaking value.

Please improve BC this way because it'a a really powerfull system but the user experience could be really improved.

Category: Development

K

Good idea but only if there is a property (as mentioned by Mike Borg Cardona on 9/10/2018) that gives the possibility to exclude internal used fields that the user never should change from beeing added to the pages (or at least to make them not editable).
And of course Microsoft should set this new property in the whole base application where needed.

Category: Development

K

Yes, we really, really need this! Some fields that are actually required for some processen are missing now.

Category: Development

K

This is much needed. It is frustrating that it can be done in the sandbox but not in the live database. Hopefully it gets more votes and is phased in.

Category: Development