Can you please make all related table fields available to users to be added via personalize vs having to create an extension to add existing stock fields to pages. This way customers can add fields they need without having to pay a partner to write and add an extension to add fields to pages.
Comments
This feature is really needed. As a work around, we had to spend a good amount of time and money with our VAR to bring some of the needed fields via designer and then integrate them in with a single extension since each design created its own extension which was not manageable.
Category: Development
Generally I like the idea, but should restrikted vie permissions.Maybe we can get a flag in record fields to set "Personalization Disabled" for internal fields or fields who should never be visible by users.
Category: Development
Please implement this - at least make it possible to add fields by administrator. So many missing fields that should be possible to add- which is extremely frustrating.
Category: Development
This is a very bad idea indeed - I completely agree with Erik P. Ernst on this: as solution developers we need to be able to control that only relevant content is available to the user rather than just throwing everything at her/him including internal calculations, buffer values, record references, settings, and what-have-you.
Category: Development
I agree above this is a DANGEROUS idea as users would add fields they are not allowed to see etc
Besides, if you work in a MS partner, you can invoice the customer for adding fields :=)
Category: Development
This is IMHO a dangerous idea! As a developer I would like that we can decided which fields the users should be able to see and hereby prevent them from "messing up their pages" with fields that either do nothing in their setup or have been "replaced" by other extension fields.
So if you plan to implement this idea, then at least make it possible to turn this feature off for all or some users.
Category: Development
Hi Development team.
In your comments, you state: 'We are considering adding it to our longer term roadmap'.
It would be very beneficial to a lot of people if you consider this to be added on the SHORTer term roadmap. ;-)
Like some other colleague stated; sometimes it is very awkward/ unexplainable that some avaialable table fields are not visible by default on certain pages, let alone that users cannot add it themselves. And while we could add them easily to the page in previous NAV versions, we are now left in the hands of developers, to use their scarce minutes to do that for us users/ functional consultants.
Thanks for reviewing this idea and I hope to see this in the next BC 18.3 update or so.
Best Regards,
Michel
Category: Development
In version 17 some important fields disappeared from the item card: 'Allow negative stock' and 'stock warning', who did that???!!! And they are not added to personilization also????????
Category: Development
This would take the burden from the developers, in order to efficiently use time and resources for the features that bring benefit to the business. Highly required by Customers
Category: Development
Hi There,
This need to be developed asap. It has been a pain in the a** for al the years i have been working with NAV/BC especially now in BC were its harder to add the standard fields to the screen!
Category: Development
Business Central Team (administrator)