Kaisei Isobe

After creating an appointment on a record in a custom table, want to register a contact in the custom table with a search field, and display the same appointment in the record created in the customized table on the contact's timeline.

However, we confirmed that it cannot be done with the current standard function.

we think it would be very effective if there was such a function in the future.

Therefore, in the future, I would like you to improve the registration of appointments associated with the contacts of records in the custom table so that you can register them with the standard function.

We would like to set up the same table as a related table so that certain fields in the original table are inherited when a new record is created, but this is currently not possible.

If the values of the fields in the original table are inherited when a new record is created in a related table, it may reduce the burden of record creation.

Therefore, we hope that this feature will be available in the future.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

With “Enable the latest RichTextEditor control experience in the default controls” turned on from the Model Driven App settings, the editor height does not automatically scale with input values in the new design.

We have confirmed that the workaround is to change to the old design or turn off the relevant feature.

However, if this feature is turned off, when attaching a file to a RichTextEditor control, the word “undefined” will be inserted before the file in the field when attached to the classic editor.

Also, when attaching a file to a RichTextEditor control, an error occurs in the Classic Editor if the file size exceeds 5 MB.

Therefore, we would like to have the RichText field automatically expanded in the future when the relevant function is turned on.

We would like to copy the solution to the same environment, so that two identical solutions can exist in the same environment.

The reason for this is that we are unable to provide a separate environment for some reason,

If we want to make edits to a solution that already exists in the environment, it is best to make a copy of that solution and make the edits.

And since it is currently not possible to copy a solution and keep the same solution in the same environment, we hope to improve the functionality to allow this in the future.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

We have confirmed that even when forwarding a mail that has already been synchronized, the forwarded mail will also be synchronized.

Since we do not want forwarded messages to be synchronized, we would like to see a feature in the future that would allow us to set the criteria for this.

Regarding the specification of synchronization tracking, it is possible to set it to "no email messages" in the individual settings.

However, we would like to be able to set this setting not on a per-user basis, but on an organization-wide basis.

Currently, this does not exist as a feature, so we look forward to be able to use this feature.

Checking the dependencies, we see a component of the type “Elements of a model-driven app.”

However, we do not know where this component actually appears in the model-driven app.

We believe that if we know what components are actually set, users will be able to consider whether or not they should remove them.

Therefore, we hope to add a column that shows where the “Model Driven App Element” type component is set in the future.

In the filter edit screen of model-driven apps, when setting conditions in the search column, I would like to sort or filter the contents of the dropdown list (in Japanese).

For example, when managing the Account table and filtering by Account Representative, the dropdown list for the Account Representative search column in the filter edit screen should be sorted in alphabetical order by the representative's name (in the 50-sound order). However, when using the name as the primary column, the system sorts it according to its internal logic in a way that does not match the expected order in Japanese.

Currently, it is difficult to achieve this behavior, so I would like to request this as a feature improvement for the future.

In a situation where there are multiple instances within a tenant, I would like to obtain the license count for each "LCS project" or "production environment."

However, since licenses for Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations are managed at the tenant level, it is not possible to fulfill this request as it stands.

I would appreciate it if this functionality could be improved in the future to allow the license information to be obtained by environment or project.