-
Missing Exchange Rate Provider for Polish National Bank
We are missing the Exchange rate provider for Polish National Bank. It is Legal requirement for Poland to use Exchange rates from NBOP and we do no want to enter them manually. It is a daily work and it is tedious to enter manually the exchange rates. The need is to automate the manual work. We prefer an Exchange rate provider which is similar to Russian Bank.
-
Vendor invoice number length
Description of problem: Vendor invoice number length is not sufficient to hold the vendor's invoice number (up to 50 characters). The field cannot be used to control the duplicates from single vendor in a period. The extension of the field is not recommended by Microsoft as the EDT on the field is too generic - Num (string 20) which is used across the entire system. -
Fixed Asset Transaction report is incorrect
Description of problem: When a fixed assets are transferred to a new financial dimension using the “Transfer fixed assets” functionality, the report: Fixed asset transactions is not updated with the reverse transactions (credit). This cause the net book value is doubled. Repro steps: Create a new fixed asset and create an acquisition using financial dimensions on the transactions. Book depreciation for a period. Select “Transfer fixed assets” for the fixed asset and select a new financial dimension. Execute the report: “Fixed asset transaction” and validate the “Total” – it must be equal to Net book value for the fixed asset. -
SLA not working on collection cases
When creating a case category of the type Collections, a default Service Level agreement is selected. When a user creates a case of this category, the default SLA is not filled. The user is also not able to fill in the SLA on this case.
-
Currency Converter Online Numeric Conversion Tool
When using the currency conversation (Organization administration > Select currency) the prices from released products are still in the company currency. No online conversation happens.It works in AX 2009, and all versions of 2012! -
Intercompany Accounting Description
In order to summarize: • In Accounting company (USMF) the voucher description is wrong because I expect to have the same description as the one put in field “Description” (FDR 2019) • In Offeset Accounting company (DEMF) the voucher description is OK because I expect to have the same description as the one put in field “Offset transaction text” (=FDE prova testo diverso) Actual Result: In Accounting company (USMF) the voucher description is wrong because I expect to have the same description as the one put in field “Description” (FDR 2019) Expected Result: In Accounting company (USMF) the voucher description expected to have the same description as the one put in field “Description” (FDR 2019) -
Posting type Customer cash discount not respecting Account structure
Description of problem: In accounts for automatic transactions a main account 80900 is set up for posting type Customer cash discount. This main account belongs to an A/S with 4 dimensions of which 2 are mandatory. When checking this main account via Trial balance a lot of transactions show WITHOUT the mandatory dimension Customer Cash Discounts should be populated with the Mandatory Dimensions setup.
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
