Jasmine Wang Technical Advisor TA

Currently user could use table extension to enable the four fields: Created by, Created date time, Modified by, modified date time for the trade agreement journals' header and lines.

Hope could give user some alternative way from UI to configure D365 FO to capture "created by" ,"modified by" and timestamp information for trade agreement journals' header and lines without extension?

In Asset Management > Work Order > Journal, if click post journal, all the Work order journal has "Hour / Expense / Item" in same screen. All those types of journals will be post together.

Customer wants to post the item journal only and currently customer will go to project journal for item as a workaround to post the item journal separately.

As Advance Warehouse Management will give user ability to create a Wave for Picking the goods and the same been assigned to a store person as a work to pick up the item and deliver it to other locations on clicking “Release to Warehouse”. Like Put Away Template.

In Asset Management, Work order Journal for Item Picking. Now, customer need to send an email to the Warehouse team > They need to keep track of when that item needs to be picked and manually, they need to select a Picking Location on the journal before posting “Item Consumption”. If it is Adv Warehouse Mgmt, It will determine a picking location based on On-Hand and other rules.

When creating a inventory transfer journal with 2 lines, one line has correct information and the other one has error. When try to post the transfer journal with parameter of Transfer all posting errors to a new journal, there is an error as follows for the first line of item as the second line has no issue, but the new journal is not created.

Posting - Journal Journal: xxx Voucher: xxx Line number: xxx Failed to resolve account number for transaction type Inventory issue and item ID xxx. You can change the setup under Inventory management > Setup > Posting.”

customer hope new journal will be created if have above error.

Customer has transfer orders and using warehouse management. they don't use fixed locations for Items. One item will be put into multiple locations and multiple items are allowed to be put in one location when capacity allowed. customer want to have a new feature that when work is generated for transfer order, it would pick item from location will start from lowest qty.

After the production order job is started, user want to increase other route resource quantity, and then update the route and reschedule the production order. Resources are not assigned to the updated jobs. Only users click job update on production all jobs form and then re-schedule the production order, we could see resource has been assigned to updated jobs.

reported this issue in issue 947150 and this is not considered as bug as production route -> functions -> update route renumbers operations and recomputes the level (sequence).

all jobs -> functions -> job updating recreates jobs however does not auto re-schedule. Re-scheduling after route is already wip is expected to be explicit and intentional. Therefore manual re-scheduling is needed to allocate the additional resource split for the operation. Rescheduling after job updating is suggested as a workaround that resolves the job resource allocation.

There's a bit of manual work involved here and product team suggest to create a ideal.

Customer has customization need and expect the picking list lines could all been selected without by selecting one by one. Customer try to customize this control and find this control's multiselect could not be updated and could not be customized.

On standard, when create a arrival journal for a transfer order, arrival journal lines will included all the transfer order quantity, shipped + on order + reserved but not shipped. when try to post it will have an error as not all the quantity is shipped, user need to manually remove the lines for on order + reserved but not shipped. customer want to know if any plan to implementation this function to only create arrival journal with shipped qty for transfer order? for On order qty, there will be no batch and LP info. for reserved not shipped, there is no LP info. then user need to manually remove those lines.

Business impact:

If users post the journal they will run into an error. It becomes an additional step for the users to validate with other WH/Departments. It slows down the business operations and adds confusion to the users about what to receive and what not to receive.

On all works form, if we add a field of Modified by, the modified by field will show the account ID: admin if we select the authentication method to be Device ID and log on the Device with account: admin@xxx.onmicrosoft.com, customer expect it will have display the user ID as we used user ID to perform the pick/put action. Even the work line has the user ID field, but the All works form don't have the field of user ID. the reason is that one device can be used by many users and it would have issues if the work modified by field is updated with the device ID as this prevent customer from able to trace who did the process.

We checked this function is only available for country Poland: Line discount calculation from the unit price for Poland - Finance | Dynamics 365 | Microsoft Learn, This is great function for my customer, but due to the country limitation only available for Poland, my customer could not use this function, is there any schedule or plan to make this function will be available globally?

When cross-company data sharing for product Feature enabled, the storage dimension group and tracking dimension group of one item will be updated across all shared entity and controlled by the code logic in class:ecoResTrackingDimensionGroupItem_DataSharingTableEvents::EcoResTrackingDimensionGroupItem_onUpdated and ecoResStorageDimensionGroupItem_DataSharingTableEvents::EcoResStorageDimensionGroupItem_onUpdated

If one item requires dimension serial number be active and is financial dimension, all the shared entity will be updated to the same.

We would expect that storage dimension group and tracking dimension group of one item are kept in specific entity and there will be an option to share it or not. In AX2009, the groups assigned to an item are shared. But the parameters within the groups are entity specific. The alternative to achieve the future state is allow for the dimension fields on a released product to be entity specific