Jasmine Wang Technical Advisor TA

The current behavior is that after upgraded to 10.0.31 and customer could not see Active trade agreement price from workspace View trade agreements”. as this workspace belong to retail mode, this form should not show the Purch price. product team just change the design with KB: https://fix.lcs.dynamics.com/Issue/Details?kb=0&bugId=702892&dbType=3&qc=e8c80df97058d08a411e0a83fea888a0bc28dd7fa248b58aab37a57b138dc8ee

Customer would expect there will be any standard way to get all Purch trade agreement price.

On the reservation form only batches/serials where there is inventory available display. The batch/serial numbers displaying in the batch reservation form shows the records which no longer have inventory.

When reserving an item through the reservation form for an item with batch and serial number, records only display where there is inventory available as expected. but when reserving an item through the batch reservation form for an item with batch and serial number, records should also only display where there is inventory available, it should not display records where there is no hand inventory for the batch/Serial.

When reserving an item through the reservation form for an item with batch and serial number, records only display where there is inventory available as expected. but when reserving an item through the batch reservation form for an item with batch and serial number, records should also only display where there is inventory available, it should not display records where there is no hand inventory for the batch/Serial.

Customer wants to have a standard sales pricing report. This report would be great to have following fields:

1.Item Price is the default price.

2.Group level price trade agreement price: The customer may also have a group level price (Trade agreement)

3.Customer level price trade agreement price.

4.Product, from qty, to qty

5.Customer name

6.Item number ......

On the find sales order form, when select a order which has more than 25 lines, the lines more than 25 lines are not visible, if user mark the select all button for the order, there is a warning popup out and asking for wait. but there will be no response and line will not be added.

In procurement and sourcing parameters, when mark the parameter to generate charged to product receipt. Purchase order line with positive quantity could generate charge to product receipt, but when purchase order line with negative quantity, charge will not be generated to product receipt. By checking the code, could see there is limitation that when quantity is <1, charge will not be applied to product receipt, customer want to this could be implemented with following reason:

1.Customer always create negative quantity in purchase order line for return purpose, and they have customization to check if the charge is correct after post product receipt before posting invoicing. 

2.Charges are applied to purchase invoice when the purchase quantity is negative.

When the accounting currency, reporting currency and PO line currency is different, there are two voucher transaction for posting type of: purchase expenditure for product when post purchase order invoice and the value is not 0. Customer needs to manually adjust the general ledger.

This issue has been logged in Issue 838716 and currently is a design limitation. We will continue to track this issue and monitor if other customers are impacted. Please help Vote if you have the same requirement, we will improve our products and services.

Every year customer has some items will not be used in the next year and there is no on hand for the items. Customer hope there will some setup to excluded them from cost calculation and cost activation. as the items increase each year, it is not practical to delete those items. customer tried to stop the item for inventory, purchase process. also tried to use Product lifecycle state, as there is no business process related to cost calculation and cost activation. still could not block the cost calculation and cost activation.

The scenario is that purchase order confirmation batch job is running recurrently and picking up purchase orders to process and confirm. Meanwhile one of the purchase orders to be confirmed had confirmation dialog for a manual confirmation open. Batch job has already confirmed the same purchase order and now the user will confirm the purchase order as well which will show a 2nd purchase order confirmation and 2 confirmation journals as a result. 

User needs to send the notification email once the confirmation journal is created. as there will be duplicated confirmation journals been created, client will receive duplication notification.  

client hope there will be a warning when user try to confirm the PO from UI to prevent it confirm for a second time without any change on the PO.

Customer scenario:

Customer tries to post picking list for a batch order (the picking list is generated manually or auto created with current posting date when start production order with post picking list unmarked). They will find some semi-finished product in the picking list don’t have on hand, as the office hour will be end, so customer may delay the posting picking list to the next day. On the next day, customer will create a batch order for the semifinished goods to increase the on-hand, and customer always report as finished at current date. Then try to post picking list for yesterday’s order and filled the batch number for newly produced semi-finished product. The backdate posting happened as the picking list is created yesterday with posting date of yesterday. When customer try to trace finished good, the semi-finished product could not be expanded, and it is the end of the node.

As item tracing is very important for customer, and this behavior is as designed in issue: 870521, would like to suggest if feature implementation could be made to popped out a warning when backdate posting is happing for production order picking list? then customer can take action at the very beginning.