Francisco Orozco Consultant

Future featuring option to easily identify, inquiry, report and potentially generate dashboard on project terms and condition forecast maybe optimum luxury. Not featuring terms and conditions forecast, user may not potentially easily include terms and conditions within a potential inclusive cashflow.

Future potentially featuring option to easily maintain, inquiry, report and easy visualize trade agreement terms and conditions forecast maybe optimum ideal for purpose of negotiations. Not featuring trade agreement conditions and terms forecast for purpose of future negotiations, user may potentially nor easily foresee potential results or outcomes from multiple customers and/or vendors or prospects.

Future featuring option to easily maintain, track, inquiry, report and dashboard business leads trade agreement along with conditions and terms maybe optimum ideal for purpose of forecasting. Not featuring business leads or prospects trade agreements, user may potentially ONLy track trade agreements at point of record conversion, rather than having option to track for purpose of multiple negotiations (e.g. terms, method of payment, FOB, delivery dates, pricing, quality control, etc...)

Future featuring CRM Marketing trade agreement action tracking for purpose to follow up on potential vendor, customer or project negotiations maybe optimum ideal luxury. Not featuring trade agreement action tracking for purpose to follow up terms, conditions, pricing, FOB, delivery estimated dates, quality control, instructions, directions, etc. user may potentially track neogotiations outside the system.

Future featuring trade agreement negotiation scorings maybe optimum ideal for purpose to efficiently track negations (e.g. expected number of calls, expected number of negotiation attempts, quality control, terms, number of correspondence, words used, negotiation amount, order amount, policies, etc...) Not featuring trade agreement scorings, user may potentially not efficiently have metrics to efficiently measure a negotiation trade agreement from beginning to end or closure.

Future featuring trade agreement negotiation scorings maybe optimum ideal for purpose to efficiently track negations (e.g. expected number of calls, expected number of negotiation attempts, quality control, terms, number of correspondence, words used, negotiation amount, order amount, policies, etc...) Not featuring trade agreement scorings, user may potentially not efficiently have metrics to efficiently measure a negotiation trade agreement from beginning to end or closure.

Future featuring trade agreement negotiation scorings maybe optimum ideal for purpose to efficiently track negations (e.g. expected number of calls, expected number of negotiation attempts, quality control, terms, number of correspondence, words used, negotiation amount, order amount, policies, etc...) Not featuring trade agreement scorings, user may potentially not efficiently have metrics to efficiently measure a negotiation trade agreement from beginning to end or closure.

Future featuring trade agreement scorings flashcards comparisons maybe optimum ideal for purpose to easily visualize, inquiry, compare and make a conventional decision. In addition to potentially future dashboards. Not featuring conventional negotiation trade agreement flashcards, user may potentially have to process conventional inquiries, reports, or dashboards, instead of conventional comparison and conventional decision making.

Future featuring option to conventionally or potential mass calculate contact person negotiation scorings maybe optimum ideal luxury. Not featuring contact person negotiation scorings, user may potentially process calculations of contact person negotiations outside the system.

Future tracking trade agreement negotiation status (eg. open, closed, pending, in progress, on hold, etc..) maybe optimum ideal luxury. Not featuring trade agreement negotiations status, user may potentially not easily visualize current status or next action plan.