Dynamics 365 Commerce

We would appreciate the ability to have calculate Customer Tax Exemption in Online channels similar to normal channels. We don't use price inclusive tax exemption and that's currently the only option in Online Channels. This is extra needed for our B2B storefront.

Hi Team

Need a option to control the store user to not reprint the other store receipt using show journal.

Example: User XYZ from Store A can allow to view the Store B receipts using the show journal functionality but not to allow reprint the journal from the POS. Need to control based on access permissions.

Hi Team

Need a option to control the store user to access the other store receipt using show journal.

Example: User XYZ from Store A should not access the Store B receipts using the show journal functionality. Need to control based on access permissions.

When importing the 'Assortment Product Lines' entity without filling in the 'LINENUMBER' field, the import outcome consistently results in an error. This hinders different users from working simultaneously on the same assortment locally. The idea is to simply disregard this field so that assortment updates can be performed by adding product lines without taking into account the line number in the local file, while still respecting the products that are already included in the assortment in the system.

Currently, in order to update assortment product lines, it is required to always view the last line in the assortment beforehand to insert the subsequent one into the local file. This practice impedes different users from working locally on the same assortment and slows down the assortment update process.

Currently in the Statement Posting batch job the tasks are in a sequential manner and if one leg is not complete the task does not move to the next stage. So if there in an inventory error in statement, the sales order posting is stuck and due to that the payment posting cannot take place since it is in the later steps.

Thus MS should think of an option to have 3 batch jobs instead of 1 in which

1. Batch Job 1 will only process the Sales Order & Inventory
2. Batch Job 2 will only process the Payment
3. Batch Job 3 will Link and settle the Payment & the Sales Invoice

In current design, the system does not support aggregating products in one single return label, so if you are printing return label for one line with 3 quantities, it will print 3 return receipt labels.

It would be great to have a feature in the future to support aggregating products in one single return label receipt when printing from POS.

As there is no scheduled shutdown for Cloud Hosted Environments in LCS, We are using scheduling from the Azure portal, But the status of the VM is not updated in LCS. Kindly request you update the status in LCS as per Azure auto schedule or give us the settings to schedule Auto Shutdown in the LCS itself.

I hope this will help most of the developers and managers to maintain dev VM's with ease of comfort

Store commerce gives the opportunity to create a Purchase order From POS, so why don't close the full cycle by creating a returned order to the Vendor?

When performing the "Change unit of measure" operation on Store Commerce POS, currently the system will search for a unit-specific trade agreement and display that price. If unit-specific TA is not available, it takes the base price and applies the conversion defined against the item master.

This is an issue because the user then has to maintain multiple trade agreements for each unit, especially when changing the price in future.

Our suggestion is for the POS to apply the UOM conversion on the trade agreement price defined for the base UOM. This will avoid the cumbersome task of maintaining multiple trade agreement lines.

Strangely, this was how the Modern POS used to work. But on Store Commerce POS, the design was changed to search for unit-specific TA.

The sealed hardware installation requires the .exe to be run from a terminal with all the data needed whereas the self service installer used a UI to receive the data. The self service installer downloaded IIS and created the necessary Registry keys such as TLS 1.0 Client and Server and TLS 1.1 Client and Server, with the necessary DWORD values. The sealed installer does not do this thus requiring manual addition of the keys and the installation of IIS. Can the sealed installer not be made to do this as well similar to the self service installer.