Dynamics 365 Finance

Customer is using service stocked items with weighted average cost model. These items are bought through project purchase order into an investment project.

If customer posts the product receipt and then corrects the quantity, the reference lot ID is missed for the partial part corrected and therefore the cost is not being reflected in the project.

More details in FinOps 747881

The mentioned report currently is using the Accounting Date to calculate the report, this is not the right date, BOE is mentioning that we need to use a Receive Invoice Date, this is a field we don't have on D365.

This has been developed already for the UK localizations on Statistics on payment practices report, we need the same for Spain.

When creating a new vendor, an error from the system appears, but nevertheless it is possible to create a vendor and find it in the list.

The error appears only if the user, after logging into the system, has expanded the tab ,,Retail" when creating a new vendor.

If the user collapses the tab ,,Retail" and then logs out of the system and logs in, then during the process of creating a new vendor the error ..Error: Field Vendor account must be filled in" will not appear.

It seems that there is some connection between filling in Vendor Account and Name fields when creating a new vendor.

Repro Steps:

1. Log in to D365

2. Go to Go to Accounts payable/Vendors/All vendors

3. Click New

4. Check if the ,,Retail" tab is expanded

5. If the ,,Retail,, tab is not expanded then expand it, log out of the system and log in again

6.Go to Go to Accounts payable/Vendors/All vendors

7. Click New

8. Fill in the ,,Vendor Account" field

9. Fill in the ,,Name" field

10. Select vendor group

11.Click Save

12 Check if the message ,,Field Vendor account must be filled in." appears at the top

Installed product version : 10.0.38 (10.0.1777.56)

Installed platform version : Update62 (7.0.7120.49)

·Business Focused Problem Description 

 The system is allowing to create customers direct debit mandates. As payments and remittances can be made from different bank accounts, several mandates must be created and signed for each customer even if they have same Direct Debit ID.

·        During customer payment journal or remittance journals as there are multiple customers and multiple bank accounts (Aguirre), with multiple mandate id’s per customer due to actual system limitations it will be difficult to select the right mandate per payment transaction which is exactly related to the specific bank.

·        What is the business impact to the customer? Customer expecting only one direct debit mandate for each customer when same Direct Debit Id is identified for banks. This is an important limitation for companies that work with discount lines agreements with banks. Customers don’t define the bank at customer level but at payment or remittance level depending on the available credit with the bank or cash flow situation. Only one mandate is signed with the customer and can be used with any of the company bank accounts using the same Direct Debit Id identified as identified in the mandate.

Actual Results: The system is allowing all customers direct debit mandates during customer payment journal and as there are multiple customers, there will be multiple mandate id’s and it will be a difficult to select the mandate which is exactly related to the specific customer.

Expected results: The system should allow to maintain one mandate in case the customer bank account and the direct debit id in the company bank account is the same. In this way it forces to have just one mandate and always use the same bank account as we cannot ask a customer to sign several mandates.

We Need to Generate Trial balance with transactional details for more than 31 days.

for example: for one year

Microsoft, please imagine such situation:

1) you have done "Settle and post sales tax" for February 2022,

2) you have prepared JPK_VDEK for February 2022 and have sent it to Tax Authorities in POL,

3) you received from Tax Authorities a note that they told you to remove some documents from JPK_VDEK for February 2022 and put to March (or other period - it is only an example)

The easiest way from my point of view would be:

a) reversal of "Settle and post sales tax" for February 2022

b) changing VAT due date for some documents

c) creating new Tax settlement for February 2022

d) creating correction of JPK_VDEK for February 2022

Why we cannot prepare only corrections for that documents? :

• corrections will have different numbers than original invoices (Tax authority said you have to remove pointed documents, not to prepare new corrections)
• sales corrections should be sent to customer (but customer can disagree with that and refuse to accept them)
• Sales orders corrections can be extremely complicated and hard to prepare

I suggest adding a filter to the Vendor aging report that makes it possible to run the report cross company. Adding a filter that can specify what legal entities to include in the report would be very helpful and time saving, for a lot of big customers, with a lot of legal entities in D365.

Warning The transaction has been reversed previously and cannot be reversed again when a previous reversal exists. If you continue, the previous reversal itself will be reversed. The transaction can then be reversed again.

Business value:

To avoid previous reversals from being reversed again.

To avoid timeconsumption.

To avoid multiple transactions.

To avoid financial irregularity.

To secure data quality.

ITALIAN LOCALIZATION

If the user runs Settle and post sales tax procedure with flag Include zero lines = No, it is not possible changing Include zero lines from No to Yes after the closing of the sales tax settlement period.

In this way, the customer obtains a sales tax register with missing invoices with Include zero lines = No. It would be useful to develop a standard procedure for updating the flag Include zero lines also after VAT closing.

Hi,

When using the electronic invoicing feature on RCS (Regulatory Configuration Services) only a certain amount of transactions are included. To extend this amount of transactions, a subscription needs to be purchased.

Despite the fact Microsoft delivers this subscription to the customer, the counters are not automatically updated.

The subscription has to be entered manually in a separate form on the usage management form.

Since this is a continuing monthly subscription, it is needed to make an entry for every month separately in this form to have it reflect well in the counters on the usage management form.

This idea consists of 2 parts

1. Microsoft updates the counters automatically when subscription is purchased
2. If 1 is not an option --> Only 1 entry is necessary in the purchased subscriptions/packages form to have the counters updated on the usage management form (and not an entry for every month)

Many thanks!