-
JSON Import Swiss Bank Master, SIX, Version 3.0
We have submitted the support request 2311300050003392.
The result was that the new version 3 of the bank master, cannot be imported into BC via CSV or JSON without manual intervention.
We were advised to submit our request as an idea: We would like to see a Switzerland-specific adaptation so that the bank master version 3.0 can be imported into BC as JSON without adaptation. All Swiss customers need to be able to import the new version of the bank master into BC without any hurdles.
-
Adding Croatian Language
Suggested by Sigve Skår Møvik – New – 2 Comments
Croatian language support is currently missing in Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations. Its inclusion is highly requested for improved user accessibility and localization.
-
BRA - ADCR Paraná - Complemento de ICMS-ST e processo de declaração e restituição para o estado do PR
Suggested by Karen Tabatini – New – 0 Comments
Complemento de ICMS-ST e processo de declaração e restituição para o estado do Paraná (PR).
Atualmente a funcionalidade já existe para outros estados, como RS, SC e SP. Gostaríamos que a funcionalidade de restituição para o estado do Paraná também fosse implementada, pois a sede da nossa empresa é nesse estado.
A empresa está deixando de restituir um volume considerável pois atualmente o produto padrão não possui a funcionalidade, impactando na precificação do itens e no lucro da empresa.
Para saber mais sobre a funcionalidade implementada para os outros estados: https://learn.microsoft.com/pt-br/dynamics365/finance/localizations/brazil/latam-bra-complement-restitution
Para ler a documentação para o estado do Paraná: https://www.fazenda.pr.gov.br/sites/default/arquivos_restritos/files/documento/2020-10/Manual_ADRC_ST_versao_1_2.pdf
Obrigada
-
Validate VAT number within EU
Suggested by Sten Baumgarten – New – 2 Comments
When a company within EU sell to a customer who does not have a valid VAT registration, the transactions cannot use intracommunity VAT calculation. Domestic VAT must be calculated instead.
In principle a company must validate that the VAT registration is valid every time the company sell to an EU customer to avoid calculating domestic VAT.
Since this is a manual procedure, this is often not done. Instead we need this to be automated,
The European Commission have create a website where it is possible manually to validate if a VAT registration is valid or not.
Wen site is called "VIES VAT number validation"
Idea: a functionality in D365FO that can be set up to on a daily basis to make that check for all VAT registrations in the Tax exempt number table.
-
Update status of Autogiro payment lines by importing a ISO20022 Camt.054C file
Suggested by Øyvind Berg-Olsen – New – 0 Comments
Autogiro is used for direct debet payment and we would like to update the payment journal lines with a confirmation of bank payments executed, based on the ISO20022 Camt.054C format. By matching the paymentID to existing payment lines it should be possible to distinguish between existing Autogiro lines and new customer payments.This should be done by importing the Camt.054C file into the Payment transfers page similar to this Swedish functionality:
"Bankgirot Autogiro returns format for the direct debit payment format of the same name. These messages can be imported as a response to direct debit messages that were previously exported. Currently, these payments are represented in Operations as payment journal lines with a Sent status. To import a file, complete the following steps.
Go to the Payment transfers page.
Click Return file-customer.
In the dialog box, select corresponding method of payment, and then browse to the location of the file to import.
After you import the return file, the payments should be updated to the status Approved."
-
Display original voucher when settling detailed opening transaction
Suggested by France Gilissen – New – 0 Comments
When the new function "Awareness between ledger settlement and year-end close" is activated, the system lets you post detailed opening balance transactions during general ledger year-end close.
Currently, when the users wants to settle this opening transaction, the only way to identify the corresponding original transaction is the following:
· Original transaction date
· Original document date
· Original document
It would be much easier to identify the original transaction based on the original voucher number.
-
Issue in customer to ledger reconciliation report - values are not displaying in Difference column..
Suggested by Mandala Damodar Naidu – New – 0 Comments
Create Posting profile.
Create 2nd posting profile for Default.
While doing customer payment journal we will select one posting profile and we will post it, later we will do the reimbursement for the same customer at this time it is considering the default customer posting profile. where there are two different accounts are mapped.
Accounts Receivable>> Payments>> Customer Payments.
Click on new and update Cust pay and go to lines.
Update the customer account and credit amount and select offset account type ledger and offset account cash payment.
Go to Payment tab and update posting profile is PR and save.
Post the customer payment.
Reimbursement
Accounts receivable >> Periodic tasks >> click on Reimbursement.
In reimbursement parameters page, select include customer with outstanding, filter with customer account.” customer” click on ok. Reimbursement process will complete.
• Accounts Receivable -- >Inquiries and reports-- >Customer-- > Customer to Ledger reconciliation.
• Generate report.
1.Example: Select any month data or small set of date (from date:10/9/2023 and to
date :10/10/2023) with include details option.
2.Select Include details option.
3.click on ok.
While generating the customer to ledger reconciliation report, when there is both customer balance and ledger balance in the report difference column is working fine, when there is no customer balance but there is a ledger balance in the report in this scenario also there is a value in difference column but when there is a customer balance but there is no ledger balance in the report in this scenario there is no value in the difference column.
Actual
Results:
While selecting include details option under customer to ledger reconciliation report unable to see accurate values and system shows zero difference on customer to ledger reconciliation report.
ACTUAL: Select any Example: Voucher number”00004”
Customer balance: 4,000
Ledger balance: 0.00
Difference: 0.00
Expected
Results:
While selecting include details option under customer to ledger reconciliation report, system should show correct difference values on customer to ledger reconciliation report.
Expected: Select any Example: Voucher number”00004”
Customer balance: 4,000
Ledger balance: 0.00
Difference: 4,000
Please fix the Report issue in the customer to ledger reconciliation report.
-
The drill-through links in application reports should work when are exported to the file or opened in new tab
Suggested by Marlena Brodziak-Górnicka – New – 5 Comments
The drill-down links feature functions only within the PDF Viewer, which means it will only work when the link is clicked within the report generated on screen, and it will open the specific record in the current page.
It should work also if clicked to open on a new tab or if the report is exported to a pdf file or excel file. It would be very useful for the users and make them everyday work easier as a result.
-
Enable Hungary Real time invoice reporting (RITR) in legal entities not based in Hungary
Suggested by Stephen C. Howard – New – 0 Comments
Customers may have legal entities registered in countries such as Germany and be tax registered in Hungary which is available for multiple tax registration however the RITR facility requires the customers legal entity to be based in Hungary to work and requires customisation to be made available.
To be consistent with the MTR functionality - features such as RITR should be made globally available
-
[BRA-FB] - A single associated fixed asset for "N" purchase order items
Suggested by Elisabete de Souza Padula – New – 1 Comments
When generating a purchase order for a fixed asset, where more than one line linked to the same fixed asset is entered, the system is computing for PIS and COFINS purposes only the first line linked to this fixed asset and ignoring that there are more lines in the same order linked to that asset.
For example:
Purchase order: OCxxxxx
- Item number: BRMF710 - Fixed asset number - BRMF999999 - amount = 985.00
- Item number: BRMF800 - Fixed asset number - BRMF999999 - amount = 500.00
- Item number: BRMF900 - Fixed asset number - BRMF999999 - amount = 128.00
Fiscal Books > All PIS and COFINS fixed assets > created 3 lines, but
Created BRMF999999-1 - Amount - 985.00
Created BRMF999999-2 - Amount - 985.00
Created BRMF999999-3 - Amount - 985.00