Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management

Hi WMS experts,

In the Pack Form, there is a button to create a new container and select a container type.

It would be fantastic and very helpful to have such button to create a "new Container Group LP ID" based on a new Sequence number and also select a container type for this Container Group LP ID.

Today, you have to first manullay create the LP ID and then manually select this LP in the new Container Group LP ID field.And there is no way to select and assign the container type to this container Group LP ID.

When performing the Manifest Container Group, today, you have to manually enter the Gross weight.

It would be very helpful (and also fantastic) to have the same "Get system weight" button that exists when closing a Container.

And cherry on the cake: add a button to print a label for this Container Group LP ID.

Vote for me !!!

When cross-company data sharing for product Feature enabled, the storage dimension group and tracking dimension group of one item will be updated across all shared entity and controlled by the code logic in class:ecoResTrackingDimensionGroupItem_DataSharingTableEvents::EcoResTrackingDimensionGroupItem_onUpdated and ecoResStorageDimensionGroupItem_DataSharingTableEvents::EcoResStorageDimensionGroupItem_onUpdated

If one item requires dimension serial number be active and is financial dimension, all the shared entity will be updated to the same.

We would expect that storage dimension group and tracking dimension group of one item are kept in specific entity and there will be an option to share it or not. In AX2009, the groups assigned to an item are shared. But the parameters within the groups are entity specific. The alternative to achieve the future state is allow for the dimension fields on a released product to be entity specific

The field Default order type is in the Default order settings form. In AX 2012, it appears that Default order type was a standard column in the Released products grid. (Not needed to be added via personalization.)

Now in D365 it appears the field has been removed from the Released products grid, and I do not see a way it can be inserted as a column. The Table "Supply type setup" does not appear in the Released products insert columns form.

Can Microsoft bring back Default order type to the Released products grid? It is an important filter for vertically-integrated manufacturing companies that have the capability to switch sourcing between purchase and production.

The item description of the supplier is not printed on documents where we request the supplier for prices. This process now requires manual interventions. When we create a purchase request for quotation, we link several items and vendors. External item codes have also been set up for these vendors.

When we generate the RFQ journals, the external item code is not filled in on the journal lines and thus also not communicated to the vendor in our documents. After performing an automated process, we still need to align with the suppliers to clarify which items we wish to receive prices for. This leads to people doing the same thing multiple times.

Vendor rebate deals/Customer rebate deals display deals for all legal entities in same screen. It is possible that users might accidentally update or deactivate the deals from other Legal entities.

If the deals are shown Legal entity wise, so the users will have access to specific legal entity and will avoid risk of users unintentionally updating cross-entity deals incorrectly.

Issue with XDS framework - Created a new XDS policy on Invent Table as primary but the Item Id look up is not filtered for user when they are part of that XDS role

When we create am alert rule for a specific table, which contains changes and/or conditions for a specific field, the current functionality always generates records in EventCud table for any record created or modified in the original table, even if the record does not meet the condition for the task rule.

For our opinion this behaviour is a gap because the functionality doesn’t act according with the alert rule definition, and it creates thousands of wrong registers in EventCud table.

Currently we can find the "Ex-factory date" field on purchase order header under "Landed cost" tab or on the "Landed cost" tab on Line details of the purchase order line,

This field is manually add, however we would expect using the requested date and the manufacturing/preparation working days, the system should calculate the ex-factory days and display them in the attached panel.

We detected that inventory value report with Transactions show correct figures that do reconcile. 

However, the inventory value statement does report incorrect values in the inventory amount when summarized (per resource group and or per resource).

There is an LCS under the number (991600) posted that this feature is not supported in the system.

We need to have this in the system as it is important to use such an important tool.

When we processing the sales order, we have the opportunity to setup discount at both header level and line level. And we will see the total invoice amount is include the discount from header and line.

However, if we proceed with a rebate, in current system it will only calculate the invoice amount with line level discount but ignore the header level discount.

This will make a result like for example:

Line 1 with total invoice amount 100USD

Line 2 with total invoice amount 100USD

Sales header has discount setup as 10%

So the sales total invoice amount would be 180USD

However, proceed rebate will see line 1 proceed with 100USD as invoice amount and line 2 proceed with 100USD as invoice amount.

This is not expected as we have total 180USD charged to customer. And the rebate should proceed based on 180USD.