Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management

As we all know, AWS supports use of mobile device, provides extra storage dimensions, and has the functionality to automatically select appropriate containers for packing.

Let's take, for example, this scenario:

We have an item A, which has stock in batch 1 in aisle location AA-01-01 and batch 2 in aisle location AA-01-10.

Now, based on the priority setup on aisle location, the system makes the reservation of item A on batch 2 in AA-01-10.

Due to certain complications, location AA-01-10 is not accessible and the worker wants to pick the item from another location.

But due to the reservation being done on batch 2, when the location override is performed, an error occurs "Location not found"

In this scenario, the worker need to cancel the work order and change the revision of item A to batch 1 manually via D365, which is a time consuming work.

I would like to suggest if there can be an alternative override option for batch override functionality in the menu item of the mobile device, which would enable the worker to change the reservation of the batch itself from the mobile device rather than cancel and change from the system.

The ad hoc movement menu item supports movement of inventory with associated work through the setup on the worker: Allow movement of inventory with work associated check box under Warehouse management > Setup > Worker. It is supported for ales order, Transfer order issue, Transfer order receipt, Purchase order, and Replenishment work.

This allows great flexibility in the warehouse as you can move items as needed and relevant work will update with new Pick location.

What we need now is for this same functionality to also be supported with "Movement by template" menu items, so that the user can get suggestions on available locations to put the goods based on the location directive logic. This will allow greater flexibility for the warehouse workers to maintain a neat and clean warehouse where goods are properly stored without having to cancel work and reservations in case they need something moved, or figuring out on their where there could be room to move goods.

Give System Admins the ability to view as the user they select (some software call this impersonate). This would allow the system admin to better communicate with the user about their issue, and it would allow them to see the potential impact of security or other changes.

When you pull the standard cost transaction report the landed cost clearing posting is added back as a variance.

If all transactions are added together there is no PPV and the landed cost variance is the difference of the (landed cost per std cost and the landed cost on PO). However these amounts do not tie back to the variance on the std cost transaction report. 

Today whs application support driver check in and check out. As only consignment is ready for loading in outbound dock ... loading process is not well secured ( missing Poka Yoke ). It is possible pallet will be loaded to truck where should not be loaded. Proposition is to have warehouse app menu where we scan appointment number and after, we do scan containers = pallets which are part of the load. Whs clerk with each pallet loaded to truck make a label scan confirming action. With last pallet loaded to truck info pops up ... all pallets are loaded ( here we can jump to driver check out step) , or remaining pallets for this load are : 1,2,3,4 etc.. Do You want to finish loading? As it is possible that customer or LSP sent smaller truck or 2 truck arrived to collect one load. From load view we need loading status overview..what container been loaded. I hope that the idea will find supporters . Thank You,

You are able to activate cost prices by navigating to the costing version maintenance (cost management; inventory accounting; costing versions), selecting the right costing version and clicking on 'activate'. On the form that will pop-up you can enable the parameter 'from date'. This parameter aborts the activation of the cost price if the from date is not equal to the system date.

However, we have noticed that this parameter is not taken into account. Enabling/disabling the parameter leads to the same result, the activation of the cost price, when the from date is in the future.

"From Date" Toggle in activate costing version works with previous dates to the costing version activation date.

Required: To use "From Date" Toggle with future dates of item costs included in the costing version which will be activated.

• To have the option to post same item in different accounts based on the vendor type (external vs Intercompany) for easy warehouse tracking of the item.

Customer statement:

The also need to be able to use the items regardless of which vendor it is bought from. They are also not able to keep them in separate bins, shelves or warehouses.

I am wondering it Microsft has heard about this problem and if you have any solutions or are making some solutions for this in the future.

The customer needs to be able to show how much of what is in the warehouse comes from intercompany vendors. They also want this to be posted to different accounts in finance to keep track of is. So the solution have to keep track of what is bought from intercompany vendors both when bought to stock, but also when used from stock: 

Indirect cost of the Input unit-based type is calculated only for raw material type.

Currently input-unit-based costing (costing sheet) can only be used as an absorption base on Items. Some client scenario's require the same functionality on service items. An example would be if the item/pipeline item itself has no cost, but indirect costs needs to be absorbed and different postings are required for example for Indirect Pay cost and Indirect overheads.

We cannot setup the item as a non-stocked ITEM type to make cost sheet work as then it cannot be used in a BOM.

We cannot setup the item as a stocked ITEM type as this will require stock on hand and possible other complications. 

Pricing management (when enabled) should replace price models when calculating price of items configured using a product configuration model.

Currently, the sales order line will calculate the price of the product based on its default attributes and not the ones selected while configuring it using the model.

In the D365 voyage editor, partial addition of TO or PO line is possible to add to voyage.

Example:

• TO line qty = 10
• Voyage editor: Transfer quantity = 5

This results in:

• PO --> delivery schedule
• TO --> new TO line

But when performing this via:

• ITMTransferLinesEntity
• ITMPurchaseLinesEntity

You receive following error

A row created in data set LandedCostTransferLines was not published. Error message: 'Write failed for table row of type 'ITMTransferLinesEntity'. Infolog: Error: Voyage lines quantity does not match the transaction quantity for line 5,00 on Transfer order receive..'

Conclusion: TO or PO line split is not possible via data entity