37
Many periodic tasks require the entry of execution date or parameters. Sometimes this uses a query which means users can use the flexible date ranges (advanced filter query syntax) however in most periodic tasks users must specify a from and to date or a posting date. These fields are linked to a standard data field which don't allow for dynamic input. This means that if the batch task was set to recurrence, the operation would be complete with the same date as was specified in the initial input. This is preventing users from using recurring batch jobs when processing ledger allocation request or fixed asset depreciation proposals automatically. There are many examples of periodic tasks that cannot be run in a batch job due to this limitation.

It would be extremely useful to have dynamics date entry for recurring batch job processing. Example of dynamics coding could be:
(day(0)) = today
(day(-1)) = yesterday
(month(-1)) = this day last month

The syntax doesn't have to allow for complex scenarios, the most important requirement is a dynamic input for today.
STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Comments

S

This used to be OOTB functionality in previous versions. Why provide the ability to set up recurrences if input dates are not dynamic. Impacts the automation of a number of key business processes across several modules i.e. AP, AR, Asset Leasing, etc eg. Recurring invoices, Asset leasing batched payment schedule journal creation, etc

Category: System administration

S

This feature is an absolute must. We should be able to use "Date interval" feature while setting up periodic batch jobs-suppose we wish to simulate month end foreign currency valuation or to send month end statements to customers, I should not have to come and enter the date every time we run it- the 'recurrence' feature in the batch job is meaningless if they will run all the time using the date values setup for the first time.

Category: System administration

S

This seems like a complete 'no brainer' and is standard functionality in some much older products.I can't believe this was suggested over 3 years ago and MS have still not provided this basic functionality!

Category: System administration

S

This would be an improvement to the product OOB

Category: System administration

S

Will be most useful.

Category: System administration

S

great idea!

Category: System administration

S

Very good idea. Many processes would need such an improvement !

Category: System administration