When entering a trade agreement, it's impossible for users to quickly scan through the lines to view the product name or account name. The field simply does not exist in the list of fields that can be inserted. Users would find the addition of these fields extremely valuable when entering and reviewing the trade agreement data to minimize both time and errors. In the event the group type is chosen, the group description could be displayed and would be blank in the event that All is selected.
Does anyone else find this idea valuable? If so, please upvote and submit a comment.
Comments
I think a description always helps eliminate errors.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Having the item and customer or vendor description on the trade agreement journal would be very helpful to our users. This would make reviewing the journals easier for them.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Much appreciated this idea!
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Long overdue
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Much needed
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
This is much needed and long overdue. Many clients keep asking for it.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Yes, this added information would make the trade agreement more informational.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Having the customer/vendor/price group/discount group name as well as the item/item group name as sortable and filterable columns in the grid would be very helpful.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Yes, PLEASE! These fields would make it so much easier for training new users and also aids in acceptance of a new system.
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
This is a definite need!
Category: Procurement and Sourcing
Administrator on 11/4/2022 10:09:46 AM
Appreciate you taking the time to submit the product suggestion. We will monitor the votes and other feedback to consider in future backlog.