The D365FO configuration is not granular enough to divide the Manufacturing execution RaF and the Warehouse management RaF (reporting as finished), and should better be enhanced by a parameter per Resource. Imagine operations running in dedicated production orders, with tangible semi-finished goods (SFG) exchanged between the machines. This is a common scenario in process manufacturing where the SFG batches can hardly be quantized and bear no labels. The output and input resource locations in the middle of the chain are not license plate controlled and do not have to be equipped with mobile scanners, as there is nothing to scan. Here we need a choice between semi-finished goods reported as finished at Job devices, and finished goods reported from Mobile scanner devices. This configuration – whether to trigger Reporting as finished in Manufacturing execution or not – is available at the Site level only, not a single Resource level. Yet an Advanced warehouse process cannot span multiple warehouses, let alone sites. This would end up either in full blown transfer orders between machines, or in an inability to track actual time at the Job card device. see also http://erconsult.eu/blog/missing-flushing-principle/