-
Prevent Purchase order lines registration prior to order confirmation
The system allows the user to start the registration process for the PO lines (with arrival overview OR line registration) before the order is confirmed or even approved, this lead to many issues as the registered items are considered as an on-hand inventory and can be issued. So there must be a way to prevent the registration process unless the PO is confirmed. -
Commercial / Retail sales orders should NOT be excluded from credit management by default.
Present Scenario: When any new sales order is created through Retail and Commerce module and is linked to a channel, then the “Exclude from credit management” option in the credit management section in header is by default set to YES which is not desired. Excepted Scenario: When any new sales order is created through Retail and Commerce module and is linked to a channel, then the “Exclude from credit management” option in the credit management section in header should be - by default set to No which is desired. -
Commercial / Retail sales orders should NOT be excluded from credit management by default. Parameter on the Legal entity level should be added that will indicate if the field should default to Yes or No for Call Center Sales Orders.
Present Scenario: When any new sales order is created through Retail and Commerce module and is linked to a channel, then the “Exclude from credit management” option in the credit management section in header is by default set to YES which is not desired. Excepted Scenario: Parameter on the Legal entity level should be added that will indicate if the field should default to Yes or No for Call Center Sales Orders. -
Enabling daily depreciation calculation for European countries
Enable the calculation of depreciation on fixed assets on daily basis for European Countries.
-
Financial dimensions MUST flow to direct delivery purchase orders and intercompany sales orders if default dimensions are provided on the original sales order.
Financial dimensions MUST flow to direct delivery purchase orders and intercompany sales orders if default dimensions are provided on the original sales order.
-
One should be able to re-invoice the invoice created earlier or the credit note created (either of them).
Current Scenario: It is not possible to re-invoice the invoice created earlier or the credit note created (either of them), instead one has to issue a new invoice.
Expected Scenario: One should be able to re-invoice the invoice created earlier or the credit note created (either of them).
-
No batch number displayed on device or request to scan received when only 1 batch/serial number in stock
Current Scenario:
While picking raw material, the batch is not displayed in the quantity screen and batch confirmation does not work, once qty confirmed, the picking is done.
Expected Scenario:
While picking raw material, the batch should be displayed in the quantity screen and batch confirmation should happen, before the picking is done.
Business Impact:
This is a critical problem that affects heavily production traceability. Customer is unable to trace if correct batch or serial is picked.
-
User who is not employed in a Legal Entity should not be able to release PO from the PR created in that Legal Entity.
“A person who is not employed in legal entity (let’s say USMF), must not be able to release PO from the PR created in USMF.” But since, the Released approved purchase requisition form is intended to show a holistic view of released purchase requisitions, anyone can create PO with PR created in USMF irrespective of permission access.
Actual: A person who is not employed in legal entity (let’s say USMF), is able to release PO from the PR created in USMF
Expected: A person who is not employed in legal entity (let’s say USMF), must not be able to release PO from the PR created in USMF
-
Functionality to reverse the Production Order (the one ended by mistake)
There should be an option to reverse the end of Production.
In many cases, due to human error, by mistake the Production Order get ended by the user. In such cases it is lot of work that has to be done again, such as:
- Create new items for N Raw materials (N items) and Finished Goods - FG (N items) that have transaction in MM YYYY
- Create the new BOM for the FG item
- Create the new formula where all the N raw material items are used
- Fix the inventory ( post stock out and stock in for all of them)
- Align all legal entities (N LEGAL entities.)
- Align other external systems (such as PLM)
- Align our reporting tools
It´s a lot of work and imply all the risks in working with duplicate data.
-
When taking any resource from the resource group, the Quantity variance should be calculated instead of Substitute Variance.
Suppose we are using resource group 1110, that is having 3 resources (1311, 1111,1115)
Actual: The estimation is based on resource group, and the scheduling is based on resource. Since the customer is using scheduling, they are getting Substitution Variance which is by design.
Expectation - When they are taking any resource from the above resource group, they should get Quantity variance.
LCS Link: Details for issue 719292 (dynamics.com)
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
