-
Need for an ‘Invoice totals tolerance amount’ option in the AP Invoice Matching parameters
Currently, there's only an ‘Invoice totals tolerance percentage’ parameter option in the D365FO Accounts Payable - Invoice Matching parameters. But since AX 2012, a lot of customers have been looking for an ‘Invoice totals tolerance amount’ option in addition to ‘Invoice totals tolerance percentage’ option. Due to its unavailability, most of those customers have had to create their own customization to support the business requirement. Thus, it would be good to have that option in D365FO. -
Need to address inconsistency on customer vendor GST/Sales tax amounts on Ledger transaction report (where Sales tax specification parameter is marked)
Issue: Inconsistency on customer vendor GST/Sales tax amounts on Ledger transaction report (where Sales tax specification parameter is marked) User is seeing inconsistencies on how GST/sales tax amounts are being displayed on the Ledger transaction report when GST/Sales tax specification parameter is marked and specific voucher is selected on the report Customer/Accounts receivable side – sales tax amount is displayed on the customer/AR summary account Vendor/Accounts payable side – sales tax amount is NOT displayed on the vendor/AP summary account = We understand this has been reported to Microsoft before, questioning which ledger accounts show the tax information, and which don't. Basically it comes down to the datamodel, and which ledger accounts are included in the 'link table' between the accounting entries and the TaxTrans. The ledger accounts in the link table show the tax and the other accounts do not. This would likely require a data model change but there is a need to address this inconsistency to avoid confusion to users. -
Default descriptions - Module postings for descriptions – Extend length for description from 60 characters to 512 -Customer/Sales invoice and Free text invoice
The description text is truncated to 60 characters in the FTI and customer invoice transactions even when it is allowing more than 60 characters to be defined in default description. Customers are also expecting to extend length for description from 60 characters to 512 in other transactions like purchase, inventory journals etc.… -
Enhance Batch processing of 'Generate recurring invoices' function
The customer is looking for an option to enhance and automate the Batch processing of the Accounts receivable>Invoices>Recurring invoices>Generate recurring invoices function.
What they are looking for is when they submit the ‘Generate recurring invoice’ task via a Batch (that is setup with a ‘Recurrence’ timing), they’d like the ‘Invoice date’ to be updated for each batch ‘run’ and get it matched to the Batch ‘run’ date.
It’s also desired that they can then have reports to verify which recurring invoices have been generated for each batch run.
In the current design, it is possible to submit to batch one occurrence but the batch parameters will not update on the next recurrence.
For example - if the original 'Invoice date' when the Batch was pushed was '02/02/2022, the next time the batch job runs (on the next occurrence), that Invoice date will remain 02/02/2022 and no new invoices will thus be generated.
-
Allow users to edit Consolidation - Elimination journal lines
Consolidations>Elimination Journal>Create new>>Lines>Proposals>Elimination proposal
- users are unable update, edit or add/delete lines on the created Elimination journal
Customer is seeing the need to edit when debits/credits are not balanced. Thus, proposing to have this feature enhanced and allow users to edit the created Elimination journal.
-
Need to have the option to exclude from the Missing timesheet report any records or employee-period lines in the report where the employee period/s have already been deleted
Report: Project management and accounting>Inquiries and reports>Timesheet reports>Missing timesheets
Currently, we are still seeing and unable to remove Employee/Date records in the Missing timesheet report even after deleting the specific Period record from the Employee/Worker record.
There should be an option to exclude those records as it doesn't make sense to include them on it.
-
Need to view related Hour transactions from the Intercompany timesheet
Path: Project management and accounting>Timesheets>All timesheets - Timesheet tab>Related information>Hour transactions
CURRENT DESIGN SCOPE:
First scenario:
When an Employee is posting a Timesheet/Hours transaction in the Legal entity (i.e. Company A) where the resource is employed, the corresponding related Hour transaction can be seen/tracked in the following forms:
Project management and accounting>Timesheets>All timesheets – Timesheet tab>Related information>Hour transactions
Project management and accounting>Inquiries and reports>Transactions inquiries> Hour
Second scenario:
When an Employee is posting an Intercompany Timesheet/Hours transaction against a Legal entity (i.e. Company B) where he is NOT employed (resource is employed only in Company A), the corresponding related Hour can NOT be seen/tracked in Legal entity (i.e. Company A) where is employed, in any of those forms (Timesheet tab>Related information>Hour transactions / Transactions inquiries> Hour
Those observed results are working as per design.
Here are the places where users could currently review those posted Intercompany Timesheet/Hour transactions:
> From the source/loaning Legal entity (where the resource is Employed, Company A), after the Project invoice has been posted from the target/borrowing Legal entity, you can check posted Hours and total amounts under PMA > Project invoices > Intercompany Customer invoice
> From the target/borrowing Legal entity (where the resource is not Employed, Company B), you can check under PMA > Project > All project > Choose Project ID > Pending transaction/Posted transaction.
FEATURE REQUEST:
Either for the employee who posted the Timesheet or a resource that has access across both Legal entities (Company A and B), they should be able to view the related 'Hour transactions' from the Intercompany timesheet entry
-
Payment Summary by Date report - allow filtering by Journal batch number and other vendor transactions related information
With the recent changes on the Cash and bank management>Enquiries and reports>Payment summary by date report, the Table Join to 'Vendor transactions' have been removed.
Users were able to filter that report by 'Journal batch number' prior to the changes and are now blocked from doing so.
This is a request to bring back the ability to filter the Payment Summary by Date report by Journal batch number and other vendor transactions related information..
-
Submit proposed Bank Account changes to workflow
This is a cross-posting of this entry from the Accounts Payable area:
https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=3da0a4b2-dc30-ee11-a81c-6045bdb58692
==
With the new feature introduced in V32 Vendor Bank account workflow, where the bank accounts are finally able to be reviewed and approved before any payments are made (long awaited)
We are missing the same overview we have with the Vendor Master change workflow.
We would like to see a periodic task, where we can submit proposed Vendor bank account changes to workflow in a batch, so any changes are automatically sent for approval. This feature is currently available for the Vendor master change proposals.
Also would like to be able to add the workflow status of the Vendor bank account to the Vendor master list.
Currently we have no way of seeing what vendor bank accounts have been changed, sent to workflow and waiting approval.
-
PO Prepayment inquiry form
Currently, there's no quick and easy way (from the UI/front-end) for users to find about on which PO Invoices specific Prepayments have been applied to, particularly if they’ve been applied to more than 1 PO invoices.
One suggested workaround is to check via the Prepayment reversal form (> Accounts payable>Vendors>All vendors – select the impacted Vendor> Click Invoice tab>Prepayment>Reverse).
Aside from that workaround being a cumbersome and very manual process, you will also not see from the Prepayment reversal form any applied Prepayment transactions if the PO Invoice they’ve been applied to had been adjusted through foreign currency - exchange rate adjustment process.
We need to have some form of Prepayment application inquiry form, where users can see all Prepayment invoices lines and the PO Invoice that they’d been applied to = i.e., if a Prepayment invoice has been applied to more than 1 PO Invoices, we should show all Prepayment application lines and not just one.
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
