Francisco Orozco Consultant

Wish there is future option to include custom tax codes from product information for purpose to easily calculate eligible potential ADV-Advalorum or other inbound or outbound taxes generated after submitting a commercial purchase order invoice to brokers, for purpose of receivable accruals at point when receiving broker (official authority processing vendor) invoice for tax incurred when potentially inbounding or out bounding purchase order merchandise.

Wish there is future option (e.g. inventory dimension) to setup an item within the inventory collection group (e.g. inventory assembly kits) without having to setup a BOM and a finished good and then explote the item to visualize potential eligible items. I did not mean item group, but a small item group for an item to be attached to within the item (styled, color, brand, or other), for purpose of future potential dashboard or power bi graph generation per item inventory collection group (e.g. summer, spring, winter). A item should have flexibility to be part of multiple collection groups IF ELIGIBLE.

Wish there is an option to easily future set inventory to inventory staging, for purpose to visualize, identify and potentially future graph differentiate item staging quantities, (e.g. transfer 100 quantity to pre-sale stage, or transfer 20 to damage, 10 to refurbished, etc...). Not featuring inventory staging,, we may not easily visualize or generate dashboard or graph or power bi graph based on item staging tracking. Featuring item staging tracking (e.g. pre-sale, introduction, innovation, damaged, racks, closings, discontinue, etc...) user may potentially have efficient resource tools to generate power bi graphs or conventional excel sales, inventory, or purchase graphs.

Wish there is an option to easily identify and/or update employee sick days (e.g. reporting via phone, reporting via self-service, or other), for purpose to potentially send sick days gift package to responsible employees. Not featuring immediate sick days reporting, (either by the employee and/or by human resources), our human resource courtesy personnel, human resource supervisor, management, council board may not easily identify eligible potential complementary items.

Wish there is future option to include a guided wizard for item unit conversion, not featuring a guided wizard, user might potentially keep instructions outside the system, rather then featuring a conventional tool for all eligible or applicable users.

Wish there is an option to easily identify a shipping calculator as per end user carrier information, for purpose to calculate ETA Estimated time of arrival or shipping dates. Not featuring end user shipping calculator access based on legal entity shipping carriers based on potential cities, miles, countries, or potential zip codes, user might potentially connect with carrier on a day to day basis, rather then connecting once and keeping the data for future usage (if applicable).

Wish there is an option to easily identify a shipping calculator as per end user carrier information, for purpose to calculate ETA Estimated time of arrival or shipping dates. Not featuring end user shipping calculator access based on legal entity shipping carriers based on potential cities, miles, countries, or potential zip codes, user might potentially connect with carrier on a day to day basis, rather then connecting once and keeping the data for future usage (if applicable). Including Incoterms codes.

Wish there is an option to identify legal entity vendor internal credit line requests for the period for purpose to track credit line limits by vendor or vendor group. Not featuring internal vendor credit line requests limits, user might relied on granted credit lines by vendors, with no option to track or compare agains internal credit lines or vendor company needs on a period by period basis.

Wish there is future option to easily identify, track, inquiry, report and compare legal entity vendor credit line allocation by period and by vendor group. Not visualizing estimated vendor credit lines internal requests and allocations by vendor group and not comparing internal credit lines capacities versus granting by vendors, we may potentially not have efficient credit line controls or extension capacities.

Wish there is future potential option to identify legal entity internal credit line balance arithmetics calculations and history tracking for purpose to identify vendor credit line requests versus vendor granted credit line balance. Not featuring legal entity internal credit line balance arithmetic calculations (e.g. based on purchase order, based on friends, partners, investors, market need, capacities, warehouse storage, employees, liquidity ratios, debt limits for year, cash flows, etc..) user might potentially relied on external vendors credit limits granting without featuring legal entity debt limits controls or extensions/reductions for the periods or future purchase orders.