Monika Kowalka ESCAL ENG

Currently there is no way to run the reports in one run for all Inventories. User need to generate this one by one. Expectation is to have an option to generate several xml files for several (all) Inventories by one click. There should be a multi-select option for Bank accounts in the dialog, but still xml should be done per Inventory.

There is no feature that support the SAD document using the simplified method under article 33 a of the VAT Act. According to this article, taxpayers have the option to settle VAT of the import of goods without having to pay the tax in advance to the customs office. In this case tax should be post to Sales tax payable and Sales tax receivable. In Dynamics 365 we have only opportunity to post document SAD to Sales tax payable and Vendor balance. https://www.lexlege.pl/ustawa-o-podatku-od-towarow-i-uslug/art-33a/ It would be good to add this to Dynamics 365 F&O

In AX 2009, 2012 R3 and earlier, we could have fiscal printers that works without Retail module. It was possible to print fiscal document for sales orders and free text invoices. Since Dynamics 365, on-cloud such possibility does not exist. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/fin-ops/get-started/ax-2012-features-not-implemented-but-not-deprecated This is legal requirement to print fiscal documents, not only to the person but as well organizations. This is a real gap in Polish localization.

Financial reports created under Financial Reporting shows wrong value in the column YTD with the currency display set to “Translate to XXX” if the year-end- process was run with turned off “Transfer balance sheet dimension” If we undo year-end-close and run it again with parameter ‘Transfer balance sheet dimension” set to Yes we are getting expected transactions/ result on the report. This has been raised under issue: 546044 where we can find possible workarounds, but these are difficult to use. Link to LCS: https://fix.lcs.dynamics.com/Issue/Details?kb=4602796&bugId=546044&dbType=3&qc=9c325e947b07a31c95ed206953924b6cad8f376c63bac64d9f48c85e85ea8b1d It would be nice to consider this scenario in next releases.

Customers need to prepare JPK_V7M correction and add explanation under field: P_ORDZU. Right now, the information in this filed is cut after 60 signs, on the report configuration max length is set to 240, according to official schema it can take up to 3500 signs. https://www.podatki.gov.pl/komunikaty-techniczne/aktualizacja-roboczych-struktur-nowego-jpk-vat-z-deklaracja-17022020/ This has been raised to Microsoft under ID 575553 but due to complexity and other country-specific features that are running on EM it has been rejected to fix. Link to LCS: https://fix.lcs.dynamics.com/Issue/Details?bugId=575553&dbType=3&qc=b5088ea29fa60ba5437f31b19a6b0ab48d33aa24b872e018ffcfad7c31b555ba

In the report configuration there is no sales tax repotting code defined for some K tags, example K_31, K_32 According to docs, the sales tax reporting codes set right now are a sample and can be utilize/change by the customer: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/finance/localizations/emea-pol-standard-audit-file-saf#generate-a-saf-vat-sales-and-purchase-register But most of the customers use standard and do not want to create derive model because it require additional maintenance and action (i.e. rebase) after any new official report version release. So, in the out-of-the-box solution we should predefine sales tax reporting codes for all K tags.

In AX 2009 and AX 2012 we had financial statements (Traditional) where we can set a parameter Debit/Credit which print the balance if the net change is DT or net change on account is CT. Example: Account 1 Op,0.00, Dt: 3000, Ct: 500, Closing balance: 2500 Account 2 Op,0.00, Dt: 1000, Ct: 3000, Closing balance: -2000 Account 3 Op,0.00, Dt: 500, Ct: 1000, Closing balance: -500 In financial statements we add the same account 2 times: Total DT Account 1 with Dt set Account 2 with Dt set Account 3 with Dt set Total CR Account 1 with Ct set Account 2 with Ct set Account 3 with Ct set Report result: Total DT Account 1 2500 Account 2 0 Account 3 0 Total CR Account 1 0 Account 2 -2000 Account 3 -500 In Financial reports, we have conditional print options, but this only total Dt or CT amounts form the account: 1. If you choose "DR" then only the Debit transactions will be taken into consideration when calculating the balance(s). 2. If you choose "CR" then only the Credit transactions will be taken into consideration when calculating the balance(s). 3. If you don't select anything - default option - balance calculation will take into account ALL transactions, both debit and credit (it would be a net change). But with the same example: Total DR Account 1 DR +MainAccount = [170001] Account 2 DR +MainAccount = [170002] Account 3 DR +MainAccount = [170003] Total CR Account 1 CR +MainAccount = [170001] Account 2 CR +MainAccount = [170002] Account 3 CR +MainAccount = [170003] RESULT: Total DR Account 1 3000 Account 2 1000 Account 3 500 Total CR Account 1 -500 Account 2 -3000 Account 3 -1000 So, those 2 features are not the same and we are missing the one from financial statements in MR/FR where we could show balance based on the net change.

According to our legislation we can correct just specific part (Deklaracja or Ewidencja), not the whole file with both sections. Currently we need to generate file with both parts which is not what is expected by the authorities. Info can be found on any accounting page: https://www.360ksiegowosc.pl/w-jaki-sposob-korygowac-nowy-plik-jpk_v7/ #vdek, #v7m, #saf-t, #jpk

The total from the lines on page 1 shoudl be shown on the bottom of the page 1 and on top of page 2 and than add subtotal from page 1 with lines form page 2 shoudl be shown on bottom of page 2 and so on. The subtotal of each page shoudl be carry over to next pages. The aim is to provide the customer's customers a sub-total per page, if the lines go over more than one side. Currently there is no option under GER to have such subtotals and for now the only suggestion is to check Word capabilities to do it.