-
Add the possibility to use the alerts in "work items assigned to me"
Suggested by Miguel Camarero Suarez de Centi – New – 0 Comments
It's possible to create alerts for "work items assigned to me" inside, however, them do not work correctly, since it is not a table where data is being created, modified or deleted.
The option for these notifications is through the workflow, but the options included are not very extensive, so it does not meet the needs of all customers.
If possible, it would be very interesting to add this function in future versions so that alerts can be used once a work item is assigned to the user.
Thanks in advance.
-
Advanced ledger settlement solve users conflict
Suggested by Sylvain Falguieres – New – 3 Comments
In current behaviour, marked transactions by one user in Ledger Settlement will be included in settlement by any other user who firstly clicks on Settle marked transactions button.
As reported several times in issues, especially in issue 636711 Marked transactions by one user in Ledger Settlement showing as marked for all other users : Ledger Settlements and a different user enters the ledger settlements module, they have the same transactions pre-marked and amount generated in the Marked field.
With an improvement, the expected behaviour would be to settle only marked transactions by the user who clicks on Settled marked transactions. This improvement seems to be able to be done since marked transactions are currently flagged with userid in table LedgerTransSettlementWork.
This behaviour would allow to let each user work on settlement without being interrupted by another user, since with a large number of transactions the marking step of settlement can be time consuming and could require to be done over several days.
This improvement would avoir error on settlement.
-
Moving MR Data Mart to separate database Engine for performance enhancement - On premise environment
Suggested by Moustafa Abdulmoty مصطفى عبدالمعطي – New – 1 Comments
It would be perfect solution if Microsoft enhanced the Infrastructure scripts and separate the MR Database on separate database engine for better user experience and faster data processing, also it will decrease the load in production database engine for large scale implementations and Huge Databases that may contain Ton of data in LedgerAccountEntry Table , Since the idea had been applied before by separating Batch services in separate servers and DIXF services also , I think it would be helpful and more power full for D365 Technical Admin
hope that idea would be Taken in consideration for the MS Product engineering Team
Thanks
-
Change the way filter button works in batch job parameters.
Suggested by Miguel Camarero Suarez de Centi – New – 0 Comments
When you create more than one batch job using the filters, then you go to the batch jobs window and check the filters (from the parameters option), the information shown is that of the last filter used, and not that of the filter being used.
This information can be confusing and give the impression that the filter being displayed is being applied when it is not.
It would be useful to modify the behavior and show the filter that is really being applied.
-
Allow Financial Reporter to read from a 'Read-Only' version of AXDB on a secondary SQL sever (On-prem)
Suggested by Josh Shaw – New – 0 Comments
Updating the fact table in Financial reporter can have a massive performance impact on the D365 application as both the FR database and AXDB must reside on the same SQL server.
Using a High-Availability group we can replicate AXDB to a secondary SQL server to act as a read-only D365 database, perfect for reporting purposes.
We recently had a need to refresh the FR database but doing so in office hours resulted in a completely unusable D365 application.
Please can you look into a way of configuring Financial reporter to retrieve its data from a different SQL server.
Thanks.
-
Possibility to change the infolog setup to select which information it should collect.
Suggested by Miguel Camarero Suarez de Centi – New – 0 Comments
It's possible to change this information in a cloud hosted environment accessing the User info table adding the following at the end of the URL:"?mi=SysTableBrowser&TableName=UserInfo&cmp=USMF"
However, it's not possible to change this information from a UAT or Production environment managed by Microsoft.
Using this option, you can select which information is saved, and you can select a user to log only the errors and avoid information message (for example).
-
Payment journal line should default the journal currency instead of vendor currency when settlement is done
Suggested by Mylene Bostvironnois – New – 0 Comments
Hello all,
Currently when using a vendor payment journal the system is displaying the vendor currency on the payment line, instead of the journal default currency.
That means for example :
Journal with urrency USD
then settle an invoice for this vendor in USD
If vendor has default currency EUR, then the payment will be posted in EUR, with exchange rate difference.
We don't want to have exchange rate difference because the payment and invoice should be in the same currency.
-
Add a feature which have a repository within the customer master where we can store a list of Customer Reference Numbers (CRN)
Suggested by Elsa Guo – New – 0 Comments
The requirement here is to have a repository within the customer master where we can store a list of Customer Reference Numbers (CRN) which is essentially a list of virtual bank account numbers that are assigned to each customer. These bank account numbers are virtual and link back to our main bank account.
For customers, the CRN is essentially there bank account number that they use to make payments and based on the bank integration setup rules, the payments are automatically receipted / allocated against the customer account / invoices as the system traces back the CRN to the customer account number.
This repository is similar to the ABN list and it should show which CRN numbers are already assigned and which ones are available. Same CRN can be assigned to multiple customer accounts if there is a parent / child relationship and payments are managed centrally.
At this stage, we don’t want the system to generate CRN numbers based on algorithms and logics as the list is provided to us directly by the bank. We are only after a repository listing showing whats available and whats assigned.
-
Electronic Reporting (ER) validation should flag obsolete fields
Suggested by Ian Bruyninckx – New – 0 Comments
When new versions of solutions (FnO or third party ISV) specific fields in tables can be marked as obsolete.
The validation on the configuration of an ER report should validate references to those fields.
This validation is needed because the supplier of those solutions try to identify that these fields should not be used anymore.
The code possibly does not update these fields anymore and will be very likely removed in the next version of that solution.
-
Feature "(Italy) Separate accounts for credit note" must works also with invoices from a return order
Suggested by Giorgia Paolin – New – 0 Comments
When you enable the feature "(Italy) Separate accounts for credit note" and you post an invoice from a return order the system is not using the account for the credit note but always the one for the revenues because at the creation of the return order the system populates the field “Main Account” in the Line details > Product with the main account used in the sales order (revenues) and uses that account at the posting. In order to use the account for the credit note you should delete manually the value in the field “Main Account” from each line of the return order. This is not an acceptable solution in case of orders with a lot of lines. At the moment of the creation of the return order, if the mentioned feature is enabled, the system should not fill in the account of the sales order in the "Main Account" field.