Suggested by Evert Bos – Under Review
When an item group has missing GL accounts, we get an error message.
But when the item group is fine but there is something missing in the GL structures, we get exactly the same error message. This is not good news for the user. The user is not getting the right message.
Posting errors should mention precisely what is missing and where.
This cannot be hard.
THe error in both cases :
"Account number for transaction xxxx does not exist".
This is factually wrong. The account number does exist. Please split up this error message in more precise descriptions.
Status Details
Thank you for the feedback! We will consider this for future releases. Kristi, Microsoft PM
-
I agree Evert!
-
The waring and error messages are poor in D365F. They are not designed for business users and very often very generic. If the system makes validation, why not to display what was validated and what was the reason of the failure? And the message should be in the readable form, which can be understandable by the accountant, not by IT or developer.