This is a huge deal breaker for any clients with multiple entities they print checks from.
Comments
Any update for this one? Our customers are patiently waiting for this feature for over a year. Really need to have some update for this.
Thanks
Tom
Category: Financial Management
Is there any movement on Code 39, UPC?
Category: Financial Management
Not having server barcode fonts hinders both our vertical products in SaaS BC. We have written in calls to outside services to print the barcodes, but they are extremely slow and hinder adoption by an organization that needs any significant level of barcodes. The processing time is 5 to 7 times the processing time with internal fonts, making anything more than 20 or 30 barcodes very time consuming even with only one barcode per document. Having two or three barcodes is significantly worse.
Category: Financial Management
Not only MICR, but regular barcodes for products - Code 3of9, UPC, etc. - big problem when you want to produce barcode labels. Calls to outside services are very slow and problematic in that you don't have control over other websites.
Category: Financial Management
Agreed Charlie - we have a customer who purchased 20ish different check stocks to go live on BC after having a single check stock with GP/Mekorma. They've been live less than a month and are evaluating options for moving ap payments to something else. Now we're trying to find integrating solutions for them, like Bill.com is for Intacct.
Category: Financial Management
Mekorma MICR for Dynamics GP is in our top 3 ISV products sold.
Intacct handles this fantastically, out-of-the-box.
While I would love for customers to embrace ACH payments more, the inability to handle MICR printing is currently a huge gap in the US market.
Category: Financial Management
Business Central Team (administrator)