We have different container sizes (filling orders) for each bulk item. When we start with bulk item filling, we have a greater set-up effort than if we have to change the container size. The sequence of the containers can change with every new production run, we have to assume a worst-case scenario in the work schedules, which means full set-up time for bulk item filling.
Planning sequence could look like this:
Container A (filling order 1), Container B (filling order 2), Container C (filling order 3)
For the next new production of the bulk item, the planning sequence could look like this:
Container B (filling order 1), Container C (filling order 2)
Container A is not needed this time, so the full setup effort must be applied to container B, as well as a reduction in setup time for container C.
One way to realize this would be a setup matrix. As soon as the same bulk item appears in the parts list, time X- is used as the setup time or reduced by X-%. As soon as a change of bulk item occurs, 100% of the setup time is simply used in the routings.
Administrator
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM,
Microsoft.