Comments
I cannot stress how important this change is for process industry. When producing cars, you of course want to inventory block all the cars which are in quality control. But for process industry, which might sample 1 kg on a 40 ton batch, that 1 kg is totally irrelevant to record in inventory. There is no reason to block inventory, when batch disposition works.In 10.0.46 at least there is some preview functionality (Continous sampling) which can bridge this gap but it only works for quality orders created by "Report as finished" and requires much more config than a simple boolean-switch on Item Sampling.The simple function stated in the idea above by just adding "No blocking" and a Yes/No would drastically improve the flexibility of quality orders, without introducing a lot of additional complicated configuration.When "No blocking" = "No", keep the inventory blocking as it is, no change needed.When "No blocking" = "Yes", simply do not create any inventory blocking. Let the quality order keep its quantity, but without any additional inventory. This is the same as manually setting the quantity to 0 on the inventory blocking, which does work, but manually.
We fully support this, there are a lot of attachments created repeatedly with the email body logos, There is another issue with this control. It does not use the full space available in the form, forcing to the user to scroll when there are more than 4 attachments. It is not possible to configure the usage space available, because it adds another Component, "Single line text" that makes impossible this. I will create another idea to be able to configure the form display option that allows the first control on a page in a tab to expand the full height and width of the form. Please, vote also this idea
It would be a valuable enhancement to split the Start Date field into two separate fields. One field would allow the user to select Beginning or End of Period, and the second field would allow entry of a date formula to determine when the deferral should start.One of our customers pre‑invoices their subscriptions. For example: the subscription is invoiced on November 18, the subscription itself starts on December 18, but the deferral needs to start on January 1. With the current deferral template setup, this scenario cannot be configured.
The slide out is too narrow, making it impossible to fully see the environment name and policy name without trying to resize the columns. The columns for Environment type, Dataverse, managed (for a simple Yes/No), and region take up too much space , while the Policy column, which the most important, is not given enough room. The policy column should be moved to right next to the environment name. I have over 100 environments to manage, the table cannot be sorted by environment name (nothing happens when I click on the column header) and the environments appear in random order. It is extremely difficult to find the right environment to set the policy. There is also no search function. UI enhancement of the usability of this screen will be very helpful.
As a developer, this is like decompiling code back to a fully editable sourcecode project.This would open the possibility to change any solution you bought from an ISV with breaking it or stealing intellectiual property.Which ISV would then continue to build products for the store?If you forgot to keep your development environment or archive your unmanaged solution - then you have lost your source code. Not Microsofts fault.