In the Quality Management module of Business Central, certain elevated actions — reopening a finished inspection, deleting a finished inspection, changing quantities on an inspection, and changing another user's inspection assignment (Assigned User ID)— are restricted to users assigned the Quality Admin & Supervisor permission set (or SUPER permissions).

Currently, this capability is validated against the specific Quality Admin & Supervisor permission set. As a result, a custom permission set that contains all of the same underlying permissions as the Quality Admin & Supervisor set is not recognized as equivalent, and users assigned that custom set are still unable to perform these supervisory actions.

Requested enhancement:

Update the Quality Management permission checks so that they validate against the presence of the equivalent underlying permissions/entitlements, rather than requiring the one specific named permission set. This would allow organizations that build their own consolidated or role-tailored permission sets (for governance, licensing, or standardization reasons) to grant supervisory Quality Management capabilities without being forced to assign the exact Quality Admin & Supervisor set.

Business justification:

Many partners and customers maintain custom permission sets to align with their internal security models and segregation-of-duties frameworks. Requiring the exact named permission set — rather than accepting an equivalent set of permissions — creates unnecessary administrative overhead and can block legitimate supervisory users from performing valid actions, even though they already hold every underlying permission required. Recognizing equivalent permissions would preserve the intended segregation-of-duties design while giving administrators the flexibility to manage roles in a way that fits their organization.