We need warning messages when the firming of a planned Purchase order did not use an existing Purchase Agreement so the resulting PO is not linked, against our expectations. - When two agreements exist for the same vendor in the same time period, this is a problem , the system always takes the first one, but you never hear an error message that two agreements for same vendor are competing. This should be just as strict as we have for date validity of BOM and Routing. - When the agreement exists but is exhausted, firming does not send any error or warning , it simply creates a stand alone PO in silence - When an agreement is date expired, there is no warning message either. Most PO's, the vast majority, are created through firming. Then we need a way to link an agreement to a PO after the fact. This is now impossible. You have to delete the PO and recreate it. This seems very crude. Given how easy things go wrong during firming, one really needs this after the fact linking.

Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.