1
We are creating “Requirement Group” to find a single Resource who has combination of characteristics as below
• Characteristic A or Characteristic B (AND)
• Characteristic C or Characteristic D (AND)
• Characteristic E
The expectation is that we see just one single Resource in Quick Book and NOT a combination of two Resources who has above characteristic combination.
Speaking to Microsoft Support, seems like this is by design and to fulfill my scenario, I'll need to list all the right combination as a single requirement and the root requirement is set to any. Since, we know that a single resource with Char A+C+E can fulfill this requirement, so does resource with A+D+E, resource with B+C+E, resource B+D+E. Hence we need to create 4 sub-requirements.
But I'm concerned when we have 10-15 skills, it will be more complex and may not necessarily be a Best Practice to create sub-requirements
• Characteristic A or Characteristic B (AND)
• Characteristic C or Characteristic D (AND)
• Characteristic E
The expectation is that we see just one single Resource in Quick Book and NOT a combination of two Resources who has above characteristic combination.
Speaking to Microsoft Support, seems like this is by design and to fulfill my scenario, I'll need to list all the right combination as a single requirement and the root requirement is set to any. Since, we know that a single resource with Char A+C+E can fulfill this requirement, so does resource with A+D+E, resource with B+C+E, resource B+D+E. Hence we need to create 4 sub-requirements.
But I'm concerned when we have 10-15 skills, it will be more complex and may not necessarily be a Best Practice to create sub-requirements
STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes