2

In many industries it is quite common for a customer or group of customers to be given a special price that has been negotiated between the retailer and its perspective customer. The standard process to do this is to use a price group that connects the customers, and in a sales price trade agreement, adding a price and changing the "Find Next" switch from Yes (where it would continue to look for better prices) to No (it finds the price that fits best based on standard price and discount search criteria. These prices, usually contractual, restrict the customer or group of customers to exclusively the price given to them in the sales price trade agreement journal. Even if the customer is part of a line, multiline, or total discount group for the item in question, because they have a contract signed to pay the exact amount, these discount lines should not be taken into account. The idea to fix this would be to include a parameter for Find Next that allows the user to decide how find next reacts when faced with an item and customer that is eligible for both a specific sales price and a discount (or any type). This can be a set of radio buttons that would include: - Ignore all other relations This option would function as it is stated. If find next is set to No at the price group level (for example), regardless of if there is a line discount group that would apply, this selection would force the system to ignore any and all other trade agreements that would be eligible - Allow compounding This option would be the current Find Next function, where the a change in the trade agreement relation is disregarded by having find next set to no on a sales price line.

STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Ideas Administrator

Thank you for the product suggestion! We will continue to monitor this idea and the votes to determine if it will be given a position in our backlog.  -Holly Haines, Principal Program Manager