Consequently if you change dimensions on G/l entries which are posted via a purchase invoice the financial reporting will be inconsistent and dependent on whether reporting is based on g/l or vendor ledger entries / posted purchase document.
I propose that the dimension correction function is expanded so all dependent posting transactions are corrected as well, so that no inconsistencies in data can occur between modules in the system.
Comments
Happy to see that the expansion to cover all ledgers is on the backlog, in its current state there are some clients that have reports looking at dimensions on the subledgers rather than the G/L which can cause confusion and force their reports to be rewritten
Category: Financial Management
This is a great idea! It should be considered ASAP as this is valuable to provide to the auditors, never mind account analysis/reconciliation. The ability to change it in the G/L was great, but it only got us halfway there. We're now left with the supporting module/schedule not agreeing to the General Ledger. I would even add that it would be nice to do the same from the other ledger entries and have it flow back up to the G/L.
Category: Financial Management
Business Central Team (administrator)