Comments
The same functionality is not working with multiple counter lines. The example above shows a counter line being used with a time line. If you are using multiple lines that are all counter lines, you get the same result described above. It will not suppress work order generation like it is supposed to do.
Use case: We have multiple users attending many different training or conference events. We like to see what the "actual spend" was for the various transactions that may have been posted through the GL, AP and EXPENSE REPORTS. We would like to create a Financial Tag called "Event" as a custom list. We would maintain that custom list. Users could then select that Event as a Financial Tag on the Expense Report, AP or GL - and we would have a "full accounting" of charges to that event. Project, and activities are an alternative in this use case, but we think the Financial Tag experience would provide additional benefits.
Hi
Definitely a yes from here.
It is in our currently solution to book eliminations within the consolidation system.
It will be much more efficient to consolidate if the elimination ledgers are to be booked within the consolidation system. Hence the ledgers are created here and it it possible to see the effect directly and if everything ads up.
Moving the currency difference out of the consolidation entity to a separate entity - gives possibilities for providing mistakes and the need to run unnecessary pre consolidations
Thank you
While I think I understand why this was done, it isn't inline with Microsoft's current recommendations to utilize Service Principals for deployment. You are basically left to also have a Service Account to make changes that would require the Service Principal to be configured in this way. Which simply doesn't make sense. That should only be required if the action you are performing requires Tenant Level permissions.
In our particular case we want to assign users roles. The S2S user has System Administrator permissions which should be more than enough for this to work. But it is not. It requires you to configure the Service Principal as a Tenant Administrator :(
Hi Philipp,
customizing the theme for an environment is possible, see documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-apps/maker/model-driven-apps/modern-theme-overrides
But it's not possible, to transport these customization with different colors for different environments from dev to test to prod.
Actually you need to do this on each environment again.
Therefore I would like to enrich your idea by providing a feature to transport different customizations with different colors to the target environments.
This removal of splitting the quantity in the outbound load planning workbench is giving great difficulties for several of our customers as well. The functionality of splitting lines in terms of their storage dimensions such as serial number etc. is important both to minimise errors and ease work. I do not understand why this feature was removed.
Imagine you have a sales line of 75 different products, where each product have a distinct serial number. Then 20 of these have been produced and you want to build a specific load just with these 20 products and the distinct serial numbers and ship these. Now you have to create a load for all 75 products and either delete the 55 products you do not want to ship now on the load lines or you have to manually set the quantity to 0 for each 55 lines you do not want to add to the load before creating it. It reduces the flexibility of sending partial deliveries from sales orders and is a lot more time consuming to create the correct load.
Before in the load building workbench, the sales line with a quantity of 75 where split into 75 lines, each line with their unique serial number and then you could quickly filter on the serial numbers of the 20 products you wanted to build a load for in this moment and add these 20 lines to the same load. Now you have to go through all 55 products and set the quantity to 0 before creating the load.