0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Stefanie Müller on 4/15/2025 3:22:49 PM

This should be standard, please implement this.

Category:

RE:

Carlos Nabais on 4/15/2025 2:15:33 PM

If you are interested on this vote in https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=6f61019f-3558-ec11-a3ee-0003ff45ceba.

Category:

RE:

Carlos Nabais on 4/15/2025 2:14:45 PM

If you are interested on this please vote on https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=6f61019f-3558-ec11-a3ee-0003ff45ceba

Category:

RE:

Valentin Heritier on 4/15/2025 1:49:26 PM

I am interested as well, we plan to migrate onto Planning Optimization but we have a gap because we need a difference between transfer MOQ and production MOQ, any update or any workaround ?

Category:

RE:

Matthew Boardman on 4/15/2025 9:30:50 AM

The latest comment from Devs links to an unrelated pull request.

Category:

RE:

Chris McCullough on 4/15/2025 9:15:34 AM

This is a must have - I actually came here to make this suggestion - no company cares for the time someone starts, its always going to be 00:00 - The date should not change when the clocks change, if I start on 1st of Jan, when the clocks change it changes to me starting on 31st Dec - really really silly and messes with reporting.

Category:

RE:

Dominiek Hots on 4/15/2025 8:02:28 AM

It is already a parameter, but only available when you turn on the Public Sector configuration key

Category:

RE:

Wim Van Hoof on 4/15/2025 7:49:51 AM

Best could be for Microsoft to parametrize this (y)

Category:

RE:

Abdel Osama on 4/15/2025 5:13:10 AM

I would suggest to keep the description as is and utilize the source type and source no to inform users about which item that generated this transaction etc, just like customers and vendors.

Category:

RE:

Kannan Shanmugavel on 4/15/2025 4:20:30 AM

I agree with this idea, which will save time for small time implementations.

Category:

  • 1 …
  • 473
  • 474
  • 475
  • 476
  • 477
  • 478
  • 479
  • 480
  • 481
  • … 500