Microsoft Idea

RE:

maddy1 1 on 1/23/2024 6:23:39 AM

x">

Category:

RE:

maddy1 1 on 1/23/2024 6:22:22 AM

xss'''>;prompt`${document.domain}`%26it;/script>'>

Category:

RE:

maddy1 1 on 1/23/2024 6:21:00 AM

">

Category:

RE:

maddy1 1 on 1/23/2024 6:19:58 AM

">

Category:

RE:

Sebastian Riemann on 1/23/2024 5:59:58 AM

I see this two point as a bug in the product:Address in ‘Sales Order’ can be changed even without affecting the address in the connected PO.System should not allow to change the ‘Planned Delivery Date’ in the ‘Sales Order’ since it will not match with the ‘Planned Receipt Date’ in the ‘Purchase Order’.

Category:

RE:

Gary Frostick on 1/22/2024 5:19:59 PM

Changing the way this works would be a breaking change, however the captions of the quantity fields on the Item Ledger Entry table are inconsistent and it would remove all confusion if these were changes to include '(Base)' so this is consistent with the rets of the application.

Category:

RE:

Gary Frostick on 1/22/2024 5:15:07 PM

Can be useful, but can also be dangerous as the cost can change depending on costing type, if item charges are applied or if cost is expected, therefore this can be dangerous. If this is implemented it must have an option to hide these fields (and ideally the cost fields) per user.

Category:

RE:

Rosa Vlasveld on 1/22/2024 3:13:56 PM

It's a recognised issue by Microsoft where the switch can be activate when there are changes made to the survey.

Category:

RE:

Brian Furner on 1/22/2024 2:04:26 PM

We deal with part numbers from many different vendors. Many of them have over 20 characters for their part numbers. Agreed that this is a show stopper for many companies.

Category:

RE:

Andreas Jnglin on 1/22/2024 10:35:40 AM

Hello Microsoft Teamis it possible to move this one to "production control" instead of "Planning as it is now?I guess this would be more correct and my find some supporters there.kindlyAndreas Jnglin

Category:

Dynamics 365

Comments

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE:

RE: