0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

I'm refering to this topic in the documentation of Customer Insight - Journey Email security encryption.Currenty the Dynamics 365 Customer Insights - Journeys sending infrastructure uses the opportunistic TLS. But my current client a customer in Germany is struggeling with this way of sending emails. Their standard way of email transfer is the "enforced TSL". That's part of their enterprise policy. Right now we can't meet the requirement to send emails from CI-J with enforced TSL because their is no way to switch from one to the other option. And the client is quite unhappy with that.As their are many very conservative customers in Germany with a high sensitivity for data security and data protection I'm asking to enhance the email channel in CI-J with an option to switch to "enforced TSL" and sending out emails this way. Even if this implicates a higher rate of email which aren't send to the receiver, it provides more trust in the platform at all.

Category:

I have created service request number SR: 2311240050001110 in which i have asked if there is an opportunity to migrate interaction data from one environment to another and I also asked where this data is stored. I got an answer where this data is stored and also that import of this data is not possible. Only export is available, which is very unfortunate. I sugest that you should think about import functionality too, just to enable possibility to migrate this data.

Category:

So with standard activities and notes against a contact also rolls up to the timeline in accounts. The interaction data in timeline for contact receiving, opening or clicking on emails appears in the timeline of the contact only and does not roll up to the account....

Category:

A customer wants to comply to a data retention period of 13 months of all customer related data.I would like that the marketing module supports a data retention period for certain activities for a certain period.

Category:

Is there any updates on support for Town Hall events?

Category:

Agree that this would save so many headaches for the user.

Category:

gewoon doen

Category:

Organisations within Australia with Multiple legal entities require a consolidated BAS return

Category:

This is a pretty standard ask. Hopefully it moves up the priority list.

Category:

This would be great to have when you have ETO Projects that are POC billing that need to utilize work centers and capacity planning along regular manufacturing going through a facility. Ideally, costs accumulated on the production order would roll up the same way to the linked job - material, capacity, subcontract - and be captured based on usage as of date when WIP is calculated and posted.

Category:

  • 1
  • 472
  • 473
  • 474
  • 475
  • 476
  • 477
  • 478
  • 479
  • 480
  • 500