0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

It's necessary — I can't believe they've removed that functionality from Outbound and it's not possible to migrate it. This affects many users, and it's a basic feature.

Category:

Good idea Vanessa, I raised the same Idea this morning under the Warehouse management section.

Category:

Should be able to use P in date formula same as anywhere else in Business Central, but I see it gives error message in Recurring General Journals if you try to use CP or anything related to P. How are they supposed to have the posting date update to the last day of the next period (not calendar month).

Category:

When clients notice this they cant quite believe thats the case for a base trial system, not great when your demoing the system and competing with competitor products

Category:

The title should be TEXT case

Category:

Absolutely critical for our customers at the moment !

Category:

You can also use the "Perform an unbound action" by adding the trigger name in an expression as a custom value in the "Action name" field to force the "Action parameters" field to show up. Then you just have to make some small changes to the JSON payload.Action Name expression: trim('')Modified JSON payload:{"msdynmkt_order": {"salesorderid": ""},"msdynmkt_surveyinvite": {"activityid": ""},"msdynmkt_bindingid": "msfp_surveyinvites/","msdynmkt_signalingestiontimestamp": "@{utcnow()}","msdynmkt_signaltimestamp": "@{utcnow()}","msdynmkt_signaluserauthid": "","msdynmkt_profileid": ""}

Category:

This sounds like an Abstract Class (abstract table?) concept more than an interface, but I am still here for it!Sales Header, Sales Header Archive, Purchase Header, and Purchase Header Archive for example, might inherit from the "Abstract Table" Commerce Transaction Header or something similar, which would define the shared fields as well as any shared functions.It would probably mean a new datatype of Abstract Record rather than an extension of the Interface datatype, to keep with the conventions that an interface cannot implement properties (look up "Interface Keyword C#"), but instead comparing a record to a C# class which can implement properties (fields in AL), the appropriate addition in AL would be supporting the Abstract Keyword (look up "Abstract Keyword C#" as a TableType value and having inheritance between record definitions, or having support for the implements keyword towards a new abstract type.Note: I did have direct links to the Microsoft documentation for the interface and abstract keywords but ideas doesn't like links (very sad).

Category:

Why this requirement still not approve?

Category:

This would save time and improve productivity in the warehouse through increased efficiency.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 500